The relationship between child’s emotions and deleterious oral habits. A study conducted in Kaunas City

Karolina Mockė1

1 Faculty of Dentistry, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Abstract

            Para functional oral habits are often found in children and adults, although their etiology is clear, these habits are seldomly linked to a person’s emotional well-being.  The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between para functional oral habits and child’s emotions. An additional aim was later raised to determine whether a psychologist is a key specialist in deleterious oral habit treatment. This study contained 412 subjects which were from 3 to 16 years old. The subject’s parents had to answer a questionnaire and to subjectively state their child’s para functional oral habits and associated emotions with it. Deleterious oral habits were present in 44,7% of the subjects. Females had higher para functional oral habit prevalence (56,5%) than males (43,5%). 3-5-year-old group (n=98) had more para functional oral habits than any other age group. 3-5 and 11-12-year-old groups and “calm” emotion showed statistical significance (P=0,040) (P=0,048) respectively. Lip, nail, pencil biting was the most prevalent para functional oral habit (n=54). Most of the children were found to be calm while executing their para functional oral habit, although statistical significance was not found. Statistical significance was seen between non- nutritive sucking oral habits and angry (P=0,012) and happy emotion (P=0,005). No statistical significance was found between parental status, emotions and their child’s para functional oral habits. A psychologist is a key specialist in the treatment of deleterious oral habits.

Keywords: oral habits, children, orthodontics, emotions.

Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
267
Medical Sciences 2021 Vol. 9 (2), p. 267-278
The relationship between child's emotions and deleterious
oral habits. A study conducted in Kaunas City
Karolina Mockė
1
1
Faculty of Dentistry, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Abstract
Para functional oral habits are often found in children and adults, although their etiology is clear,
these habits are seldomly linked to a person’s emotional well-being. The aim of this study was to examine
the relationship between para functional oral habits and child’s emotions. An additional aim was later raised
to determine whether a psychologist is a key specialist in deleterious oral habit treatment. This study
contained 412 subjects which were from 3 to 16 years old. The subject’s parents had to answer a
questionnaire and to subjectively state their child’s para functional oral habits and associated emotions with
it. Deleterious oral habits were present in 44,7% of the subjects. Females had higher para functional oral
habit prevalence (56,5%) than males (43,5%). 3-5-year-old group (n=98) had more para functional oral
habits than any other age group. 3-5 and 11-12-year-old groups and “calm” emotion showed statistical
significance (P=0,040) (P=0,048) respectively. Lip, nail, pencil biting was the most prevalent para
functional oral habit (n=54). Most of the children were found to be calm while executing their para
functional oral habit, although statistical significance was not found. Statistical significance was seen
between non- nutritive sucking oral habits and angry (P=0,012) and happy emotion (P=0,005). No statistical
significance was found between parental status, emotions and their child’s para functional oral habits. A
psychologist is a key specialist in the treatment of deleterious oral habits.
Keywords: oral habits, children, orthodontics, emotions.
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
268
1. INTRODUCTION
Typical oral habits include swallowing,
breathing, talking, chewing and less specific ones
like emotional communication, facial expression
and facial appearance [1]. Oral dysfunctions or
para functional oral habits are habits known as
nail and finger biting, atypical swallowing, teeth
grinding (bruxism), mouth breathing, tongue
thrusting and non-nutritive sucking habits such
as finger, pacifier sucking. Deleterious oral
habits are described as those that are done over a
long period of time. Most of the time these habits
are done unconsciously, but it also could be done
consciously during normal daily activities. The
etiology of the deleterious habits can be a
disharmonious relationship of parents and their
children, premature weaning, emotional
disturbances, dental and skeletal anomalies and
different oral diseases, parasomnia, neurological
disabilities and even brain injury [2,4].
Emotional distress in early childhood has been
said to cause problems in later life such as
different psychological difficulties, crime,
antisocial behavior, violence, drug use and
abnormal habits like para functional oral habits
[3]. Having these atypical oral habits over a long
period of time and not treating them causes harm
to various oral structures in the mouth and the
body [4]. Deleterious oral habits cause
malocclusion, faster deterioration of teeth and
the periodontal tissue, inflammation, muscular
dysfunction, temporomandibular disorders,
incorrect posture and many more [5].
Dubey et al. (2018) [6] divides these
dysfunctional oral habits into two groups.
Acquired oral habits are described as habits that
are learned and could be easily stopped if the
child wants to or is told to. On the other hand,
compulsive oral habits form due to emotional
stress that a child is put under and the oral
dysfunction is a way of coping for them. This
form of oral habit is much harder to stop as the
child will experience an increase in stress levels
and cause more anxiety [6]. According to some
authors deleterious oral habits are said to be
abnormal and need to be treated, when the child
reaches 6 years old, otherwise they are
considered normal and can spontaneously stop
[2].
It has been known for many years that
emotional stress is one of the key factors causing
and exacerbating oral para functional oral habits.
The emotional status of a child and stress relates
to para functional oral habits as it's usually seen
as the way that a person responds to and/or
recovers from stress [4]. The emotional stress
that a child experiences will usually cause an
increased activity in para functional oral habit
frequency [7]. Para functional oral habit such as
nail biting is highly associated with stress,
obsessive compulsive disorder, depression,
anxiety and many other emotional disorders.
These para functional oral habits help children to
soothe themselves and to let out their
experienced frustration and disappointment [8].
The deleterious oral habits are an adaptive means
of dealing with tense situations and that’s why
they can’t be quickly eliminated or stopped and
the treatment may take a while. First the child
should be taught to control and solve their
emotional problems and then the oral habit
should be taken care of [9]. According to
Massler [9] non-nutritive sucking, transitions to
nail biting due to a demanding environment that
the child is put in. This happens as the child is
asked to stop or control their childish whims and
emotions, then they are given more responsibility
that they can cope with or are told to follow
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
269
certain rules that make them feel depressed,
annoyed and/or frustrated.
A relationship between para functional
oral habits and socio-economic status is also a
very important factor in deleterious oral habit
occurrence and frequency. A study done in 2011
[10] found that parents with higher education
level and higher income have fewer children that
are nail bitters, compared to those with lower
socio-economic status overall. Some authors say
that stress related disturbances such as
depression, anxiety, nervousness is a problem of
a highly developed society and the fast living
pace negatively affects the human psyche
[11,12]. The higher developed society stressors
include large number of duties, the need for good
education, the uncertainty of the future, the need
of good career and high income earnings [13]. It
is also said that mental health can be affected by
culture and their value system on education, life
goals, their life expectations, cultural standards
and concerns [1].
There are very few studies done only
examining the relationship of child's emotional
being and their present dysfunctional oral habits.
It is necessary to evaluate the child’s emotional
status in order to make orthodontic treatment
successful and long lasting. According to
Schwartz [14] para functional oral habit such as
nail biting is a bigger issue than it seems and the
child may need psychotherapy to identify the
underlying psychological issues. Thus the aim of
this study is to examine the relationship between
various oral para functional oral habits and
child's emotional state according to their parents.
An additional aim is to understand and identify if
a child psychologist is a key specialist in the
treatment of para functional oral habits.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Population and sampling
This study was conducted in July of 2019.
Eligibility criteria was chosen to be parents who
had preschool and school aged children and were
living in Kaunas city at the moment of the
questionnaire passing. Exclusion criteria were
parents who had older children and weren’t
living in Kaunas City. The questionnaire was
distributed through social media platform
“Facebook”. The sample size was calculated
using a sample size calculator formula. The
sample size needed was 350 subjects, with a
margin error of 5% and confidence level at 95%.
The actual sample size came to be 412
participants who met eligibility criteria.
Data collection
The data was collected though a third
party website called “Apklausa.lt”. The main
objective of the questionnaire was that parents
had to select and identify their child’s specific
para functional oral habits and to subjectively
evaluate the child’s emotions.
The questionnaire had 6 different
sections. First section included demographic
questions about the child, their gender and age.
Second section asked about the child’s nutritive
habits up to 6 months and up to 1 year. It further
asked if the child was bottle fed and if so, what
was the bottle teat: physiological or non-
physiological. In the third section the parents
were asked about the child’s history of oral
dysfunctions. They were asked to select one or
few of the listed para functional oral habits (if
applicable) and the length of time that the child
had this para functional oral habit. In the fourth
section the questions were the same as in the
third, except that it was inquiring about current
dysfunctional oral habits. In the fifth section
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
270
parents were asked about the most common place
where they saw the child executing the para
functional oral habits, how long it took at a single
time and what was the child's emotional status.
In the sixth and final section the parents had to
state their educational status.
Data analysis
The collected data was analyzed using
SPSS 25th version. The difference between
subjects and variables were evaluated using
nonparametric tests: Chi square independent test.
P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically
significant. Categorical variables were presented
in terms of frequency and percentage.
3. RESULTS
There were 412 subjects, that matched the
inclusion criteria. 224 (54,4%) of those were
girls and 188 (45,6%) were boys. The age
dispersed as follows: 266 (64,5%) subjects were
between 3-5 years old, 89 (21,7%) were between
7-9 years old, 37 (8,9%) were between 11-12
years old and 20 (4,9%) subjects were between
15-16 years old.
Out of the 412 subjects, 184 (44,7%)
children have at least one deleterious oral habit
of those 104 (56,5%) are girls and 80 (43,5%) are
boys. Nail, pencil and lip biting is the most
occurring para functional oral habit (n=77).
Second and third most occurring para functional
oral habit is non-nutritive sucking habit and
mouth breathing both having 47 subjects. 37
children have bruxism and only 3 participants
have tongue thrusting deleterious oral habit. 158
(85,9%) out of 184 children have only one para
functional oral habit and 26 (14,1%) children
have 2 or more para functional oral habits.
According to the subject’s parents out of
184 children with para functional oral habits, 133
(72,3%) of them experience at least one sort of
emotion and 29 (15,7%) children experience two
or more different emotions while executing the
para functional oral habits. The remaining
parents (12%) reported that they are not aware of
their children’s emotions and didn’t choose an
answer. 75 of the subjects are calm, 21 are
annoyed, 1 is angry, 5 subjects are annoyed and
angry, 2 are annoyed and experiencing another
emotion and 5 subjects are happy. 31 parent said
that the child experienced some other emotion
that was not included in the questionnaire.
Across the gender and emotion dispersion
(table 1), females experienced more emotions,
excepts for the “anger” emotion, which was
experienced more often by males. Although no
statistical significance between gender and
emotion were found.
Between all of the age groups, most
commonly felt emotion was “calm” (Table 1).
The 3-5-year-old as well as 11-12-year-old
findings with “calm” emotion showed statistical
significance. Most prevalent emotion between
11-12 year olds was chosen to be another
emotion not included in the questionnaire.
Table 2 shows emotion and para function
oral habit dispersion, the calm and annoyed
children were found to have nail, lip and pencil
biting most often. Statistical significance was
found in the angry and happy emotion group and
non-nutritive sucking habit group.
Table 3 examines parental education level
and the link between their child’s experienced
emotions. No statistical significance between
parental education and child’s emotions was
found, but the most chosen emotion was “calm”
across all parental education levels.
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
271
Parents across all education levels most
often has children with nail, lip and pencil biting
oral para functional oral habit (Table 4).
Although this discovery, no statistical
significance was found between parental
education status and their child’s para functional
oral habits.
Table 1 Emotion dispersion across gender and age of sampled group
Calm
n
Annoyed
n
Angry
n
Happy
n
Another
emotion n
Doesn’t
know
n
Gender
Male
40
P= 0,796
16
P=0,514
10
P=0,276
4
P=0,242
18
P=0,587
11
P=0,511
Female
54
P= 0,796
25
P=0,514
8
P=0,276
10
P=0,242
28
P=0,587
11
P=0,511
Age (years)
3-5
23
P=0,381
9
P=0,852
20
P=0,184
11
P=0,218
7-9
21
P=0,178
11
P=0,974
5
P=0,424
12
P=0,438
8
P=0,271
11-12
4
P=0,048
5
P=0,283
0
P=0,246
6
P=0,053
3
P=0,316
15-16
4
P=0,438
2
P=0,508
0
P=0,475
0
P=0,204
0
P=0,359
n:frequency, P: p-value *P value statistically significant <0,05
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
272
Table 2 Emotion dispersion and deleterious oral habits
Calm
n
Annoyed
n
Angry
n
Happy
n
Another
emotion n
Doesn’t know
n
Oral habits
Non-nutritive
sucking habit
27
P=0,312
14 P=0,152
9
P=0,012
8
P=0,005
8
P=0,476
3
P=0,172
Nail, lip, pencil
biting
38
P=0,689
21
P=0,168
8
P=0,814
4
P=0,295
15
P=0,739
10
P=0,715
Teeth grinding
20
P=0,553
5
P=0,068
2
P=0,565
1
P=0,428
12
P=0,128
1
P=0,138
Tongue thrusting
0
P=0,074
1
P=0,643
0
P=0,565
1
P=0,090
0
P=0,373
1
P=0,250
Mouth breathing
26
P=0,501
8
P=0,315
5
P=0,819
4
P=0,787
8
P=0,476
7
P=0,472
n:frequency, P: p-value *P value statistically significant <0,05
Table 3 Parent educational status and emotion dispersion
Calm
n
Annoyed
n
Angry
Happy
n
Another emotion n
Doesn’t know
n
Education level
Primary
education
8 P=0,856
4
P=0,670
1
P=0,672
1
P=0,886
3
P=0,948
0
P=0,136
Secondary
education
26
P=0,302
8
P=0,403
5
P=0,730
3
P=0,784
7
P=0,331
12
P=0,984
Higher education
47
P=0,226
23 P=0,799
9
P=0,697
8
P=0,827
26
P=0,051
12
P=0,984
Post graduate
diploma
13
P=0,746
6
P=0,732
3
P=0,631
2
P=0,886
2
P=0,110
4
P=0,446
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
273
Table 3 Parent educational status and emotion dispersion
Calm
n
Annoyed
n
Angry
Happy
n
Another emotion n
Doesn’t know
n
n:frequency, P: p-value *P value statistically significant <0,05
Table 4 Parent educational status and oral para functional habits
Non-
nutritive
sucking
n
Nail, lip,
pencil biting
n
Teeth grinding
n
Tongue
thrusting
n
Mouth breathing
n
Education level
Primary education
5
P=0,470
7
P=0,693
1
P=0,376
1
P=0,108
4
P=0,917
Secondary education
10
P=0,557
17
P=0,524
8
P=0,197
0
P=0,320
11
P=0,846
Higher education
28
P=0,404
41
P=0,799
25
P=0,115
2
P=0,666
25
P=0,854
Post graduate diploma
4
P=0,285
12
P=0,385
3
P=0,556
0
P=0,499
7
P=0,662
n:frequency, P: p-value *P value statistically significant <0,05
4. DISCUSSION
There are very few studies done that
evaluate various para functional oral habits and a
child's emotions. Some studies briefly discuss the
relationship between temporomandibular joint
disorders and emotional status in children and
adults. Other studies highlight the importance of
income and family life in terms of para functional
oral habit occurrence.
Overall this study findings of para
functional oral habit prevalence (44,7%) in
preschool and school aged children matches
Leme et al. [1] study, which found that 71,3% of
children have at least one deleterious oral habit.
In a study done by Dubey et al. [s6] the para
functional oral habit prevalence matched this
study findings, with the oral habit occurrence at
45,2%. In the Leme et al. study they found, that
the para functional oral habit prevalence was
higher in the girl group. It is also seen that nail,
pencil and lip biting is the most prevalent oral
habit [1]. Para functional oral habits most
frequently occur in the 3-6-year-old group [6].
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
274
Bano et al. (2019) found that people with
dependent personality disorder, which is
explained as people with anxiousness, fear and
feeling nervous, have higher levels of nail biting,
compared to those that don’t have this disorder.
It is also quite clear that children that have non-
nutritive sucking habits like pacifier or digit
sucking, later in life adopt nail biting, pencil
biting or smoking habits as a way of coping [16].
If a child persists with non-nutritive sucking
habits for a long period of time, some authors
suggest that they are under physical or
psychological stress, feeling anxious, bored or
even excited [23]. A study done in Brazil
confirms these findings, as their study shows that
children with oral dysfunctions have worse oral
health related quality of life, and thus it further
impacts their oral health related quality of life
and their dysfunctional oral habits intensify [1].
A study found that children who have
bruxism, especially sleep bruxism most often
have obsessive compulsive disorder as well as
they tend to have a controlling and aggressive
personality [15]. A Mexican study [19] found
that children who had deleterious oral habits
were found to be tired, emotionally unstable or
even often annoyed. Leme et al. study done in
Brazil confirm these findings and found that
58,7% of children with various para functional
oral habits had depressive symptoms and an
increased cortisol blood levels [21]. Another
study found that children who had anxiety
disorders and bruxism, also had pacifier sucking
and biting habits [23]. A study conducted by
Brancher et al. (2020) [26] shows that children
with sleep bruxism are the ones who internalize
their problems, often have peer pressure issues
and abnormal emotional symptoms.
According to Santos et al. [17] para
functional oral habit like non-nutritive sucking
can be a positive emotion expression way for
children. This connection is formed when a
newborn is breast fed and the positive bond
between mouth, lips, tongue and the sucking
sensation occurs. Later on in life these children
try to find this positive sensation and recreate it
with other objects like pencils or fingers. A study
done in Mexico in 2019 [18] showed that
children that had various deleterious oral habits
more often were found to be calm, bored and
having nothing to do. A Spanish study done in
2005 [23] agrees with the previous data, as they
found that children with oral habits often were
bored or even excited.
A study conducted in Saudi Arabia (2016)
[3] investigated para functional oral habit
prevalence in orphan children and non-orphans.
It was discovered that orphaned children had
more para functional oral habits with the most
prevalent being digit sucking, whereas non
orphans had more nail biting. It was known that
all of these children were orphans from infancy,
were raised by foster mothers and were not breast
fed at all. The authors made a presumption that
these children were in lack of the intimate, close
positive feeling that children get while being
breast fed by their mothers and so they tried to
stimulate this feeling by choosing digit sucking
oral habit.
A study done in 2019 [8] investigated the
link between socioeconomic status and nail
biting in adult population. The study collected
data such as income, education level, the
subject’s specific profession and nail biting para
functional oral habit. It was found low
socioeconomic status more times leads to nail
biting oral habit prevalence development than
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
275
those with higher standards of living. This study
also discovered that subjects with higher
education level had less chance to develop nail
biting para functional oral habit. Contradicting
findings were made in a study done in Poland
[11] which showed that highly developed
societies are more likely to suffer from stress
related disorders and so the number of
deleterious oral habits that people experience is
rising. Authors in Mexico agree with this, as in
their study same conclusions were drawn that,
children with highly educated parents have more
para functional oral habits than those with low
education levels. Calisti et al. [22] in their study
found that dysfunctional oral habits especially
non-nutritive sucking was more prevalent in
children living in towns and cities, rather than
rural areas. Children with mothers who work
outside of their homes found themselves feeling
lonely and dissatisfied and as a mean of
compensating this feeling they adapted a para
functional oral habit [22].
A case-control report done in Spain
evaluated para functional oral habits with family
status and discovered that children who were
raised by grandparents, single parent or had
arguing parents had an increased chance to
develop para functional oral habits than those
children who had a harmonious family life with
both of the parents involved [27].
A study done in Saudi Arabia [4]
evaluating the para functional oral habit and
emotional status relationship on adults showed
similar results as in those studies done with
children. The findings came to be that people
who are emotionally stable tend to have less para
functional oral habits including nail biting, teeth
grinding, teeth clenching and lip/pencil biting.
Also these people were less likely to report
temporomandibular joint disorders. It becomes
clear that if para functional oral habits are not
treated in childhood, they tend to carry over to
adulthood. Another study found that adults with
lower income were 1.4 times more susceptible to
have teeth clenching. It was also discovered that
younger males in particular had 1.95 more
chances of lip/object biting and 1.4 more times to
object and lip bite if they were single. From this
we can say that younger people are more
susceptible to stress and not knowing how to deal
which leads to an increase in deleterious oral
habit occurrence. Financial status and marital
status also plays an important role in para
functional oral habit prevalence.
A study done back in 2002 by Alamoudi
[25] had drawn similar conclusions to this study
as their study principle was almost identical. In
both of these studies the subject’s parents had to
choose and evaluate their child's emotions
subjectively. As in this study they found no
significant correlation between all child's
emotions and para functional oral habits.
5. CONCLUSION
64,5% of children in this study were
between 3-5 years old. 44,7% of children have at
least one para functional oral habit. The most
prevalent deleterious oral habit is nail, pencil and
lip biting. Overall girls experience more
emotions than boys.
“Angry” and “happy” emotions showed
statistical significance with non-nutritive
sucking oral habit. Other emotions and para
functional oral habits showed no statistical
significance. 3-5 and 11-12 year olds and “calm
emotion showed statistical significance. From
this we can say that a psychologist is a key
specialist in diagnosing and treating deleterious
oral habits as child’s emotions play an important
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
276
role in para functional oral habit occurrence and
frequency.
Parents that have higher education level
more often have children with 1 or more para
functional oral habits. Although no statistical
significance was found between parental
educational level, para functional oral habits and
their child’s emotions.
In the end each and every person receives
the world and its caused stress differently. Some
people are seen to deal with stress by clenching
or grinding their teeth and biting their nails.
Interdisciplinary approach is very important
while treating children and adults with
dysfunctional oral habits. These deleterious oral
habits can be managed by the means of
orthodontic treatment and psychological
approach of attention giving, support,
counselling, reward and a remainder system [9].
This study needs to further examine the
emotional status of children by a professional
psychologist before orthodontic treatment
begins, to fully understand the etiology of para
functional oral habits. This is important in order
to have successful treatment without the
possibility of habit or malocclusion
reoccurrence.
6. LIMITATIONS
The limitations of this study were that the
parents considered their children’s emotions
subjectively. To understand the true child’s
experienced emotions, the children need to be
asked and evaluated by a professional.
To truly apprehend and link the
relationship between socioeconomic status and
para functional oral habits, the questionnaire
should be extended and the parents should be
asked to state their profession, and income
margins, not just their education level alone.
7. REFERENCES
1.
Leme, M. S., Barbosa, T. D., Gavião, M. B.
Relationship among oral habits, orofacial
function and oral health-related quality of life in
children. Brazilian Oral Research 2013; 27(3):
272-278. doi:10.1590/s1806-
83242013000300006
2.
Gartika, M. The effect of oral habits in the oral
cavity of children and its treatment. Padjadjaran
Journal of Dentistry 2008; 20 (2): 123-129.
3.
AlSadhan S., A., Al- Jobair A., M. Oral habits,
dental trauma, and occlusal characteristics
among 4- to 12- year old institutionalised orphan
children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Spec Care
Dentist 2016; XX(X): 1-9.
4.
Almutairi, A.F. et al., Association of oral para
functional oral habits with anxiety and the Big-
Five Personality Traits in the Saudi adult
population. Saudi Dental Journal 2020;
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.01.003
5.
Omer MI, Abuaffan AH. Prevelence of oral
habits and its effect in primary dentition among
sudanese preschool children in khartoum city.
Indian journal of dental education 2015; 8(2): 57-
62.
6.
Dubey, R., Kashyap, N., Avinash, A., Kumar, B.
Oral habits in 3 to 12 years of children: a burden
on developing dentition. International journal of
scientific research 2018; 7(4): 36-38.
7.
Alamoudi N. Correlation between oral para
functional oral habits and temporomandibular
disorders and emotional status among Saudi
children. The journal of clinical pediatric
dentistry 2001; 26(1): 71-80.
8.
Bano, Z., Warraich, I. A., Naz, I and Shahzadi,
A. Socioeconomic Status, Dependent Personality
and Nail Biting Behavior Among Adults:
Evaluation of Structural Relationship, Review of
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
277
Economics and Development Studies 2019; 5
(2): 387-396
9.
Massler M. Oral habits: Development and
management. J Pedodont 1983;7(2):109-19.
10.
Rajchanovska, D., & Zafirova, B. Prevalence of
Nail Biting among Preschool Children in Bitola.
The Journal of Special Education and
Rehabilitation 2011; 12(1/2): 56-68.
11.
Wieckiewicz M, Paradowska Stolarz A.
Wieckiewicz W. Psychosocial Aspects of
Bruxism: The Most Paramount Factor
Influencing Teeth Grinding. BioMed Research
International 2014;1-7.
12.
Wieckiewicz M, Grychowska N, Wojciechowski
K, Pelc A, Augustyniak M, Sleboda A, Zietek M.
Prevalence and Correlation between TMD Based
on RDC/TMD Diagnoses, Oral Para functional
oral habits and Psychoemotional Stress in Polish
University Students. BioMed Research
International. 2014;1-7.
13.
A. U. J. Yap, S. F. Dworkin, E. K. Chua, T. List,
K. B. C. Tan, and H. H. Tan, “Prevalence of
temporomandibular disorder subtypes,
psychologic distress, and psychosocial
dysfunction in Asian patients,” Journal of
Orofacial Pain 2003; 17(1): 21–28.
14.
Schwartz, A. It’s Called Onychophagia or Nail
Biting 2019. Retrieved from
https://www.mentalhelp.net/blogs/it-s-called-
onychophagia-or-nail-biting/
15.
R. J. Marker, J. L. Stephenson, B. M. Kluger, D.
Curran-Everett, and K. S. Maluf, “Modulation of
intracortical inhibition in response to acute
psychosocial stress is impaired among
individuals with chronic neck pain,” Journal of
Psychosomatic Research 2014; 76 (3): 249–256.
16.
Atsu, S.S., Guner, S., Palulu, N., Bulut, A. C.,
Kurkcouglu, I. Oral para functional oral habits,
personality traits, anxiety and their association
with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular
disorders in the adolescents. African Health
Sciences 2019; 19 (1): 1801-1810.
17.
Santos SA, Holanda AL, Sena MF, Gondim LA,
Ferreria MA. Nonnutritive sucking habits among
preschool-aged children. J Pediatr 2009; 85: 408-
414.
18.
Priyadarshini D., Solomon N., Ravindran S.,
Moses J. Prevalence of oral habits in children and
its correlation with malocclusion- a cross
sectional study. International journal of scientific
research 2019;8 (6): 14-15.
19.
Murrieta-Pruneda JF, Allendelagua-Bello RI,
rez-Silva LE, Juárez-López LA, Linares-
Vieyra C, Meléndez-Ocampo AF. Prevalence of
non-nutritive buccal habits in a group of
preschool children in Nezahualcoyotl City,
México. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2011;68 (1)
:24-30.
20.
Rondon RG., Zambrano GJ., Guerra ME.,
Rodriguez de Galarraga B. Relation between
exclusive breastfeeding less than 6 months and
para functional oral habital habits in a group of
Venezuelan children and adolenscents. Revista
de Odontopediatria Latinoamericana 2018;8 (1):
16-28.
21.
Leme, M., Barbosa, T., Castelo, P., & Gavião, M.
Associations between Psychological Factors and
the Presence of Deleterious Oral Habits in
Children and Adolescents. Journal of Clinical
Pediatric Dentistry 2014; 38(4): 313–317.
22.
Calisti. In: Koch S, Poulsen S. Pediatric dentistry
a clinical approach. Copenhagen: Munksgaard
2001; 321(49): 411-9.
23.
Paredes GV, Paredes CC. Prevalence of oral
habits and teeth alterations in schoolchil- dren
from Valencia (Spain) An Pediatr (Barc) 2005;
62: 261-5.
Journal of Medical Sciences. Mar 30, 2021 - Volume 9 | Issue 2. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
278
24.
Soares-Silva L, Tavares-Silva C, Fonseca-
Gonçalves A, Maia LC. Presence of oral habits
and their association with the trait of anxiety in
pediatric patients with possible sleep bruxism. J
Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019; 37: 245-50.
25.
Alamoudi, N. Correlation between oral para
functional oral habit and temporomandibular
disorders and emotional status among Saudi
children. J. Clin. Pediatric Dent 2002; 26 (1): 71–
80.
26.
Brancher L., C., Jansen K., Reyes A., Goettems
M., L. Social, emotional, and behavioural
problems and parent-reported sleep bruxism in
schoolchildren. The journal of the American
dental association 2020; 151(5): 327-333.
27.
Romagosa D., E., R., Gamboa M., R., P., Muniz
Y., A., Oliva L., M., Q., Oliva D., E., Naranjo S.,
T. Risk factors associated with deforming oral
habits in children aged 5 to 11: a case-control
study. Medwave 2014; 14(2).