https://doi.org/10.53453/ms.2025.1.2
Femoral head avascular necrosis: etiopathogenesis, diagnostics
and treatment – literature review
Vėjas Jokubynas
1
1
Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
Abstract
Background. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is characterized by diminished blood flow to the femur's
head, which leads to osteonecrosis, and results in the eventual structural collapse of the femoroacetabular joint.
Changes in blood supply can arise due to a traumatic incident or stem from a non-traumatic origin (corticosteroids
usage; alcohol consumption). To date, there is no consensus on treatment, and existing methods are controversial.
Aim: Review the literature on femoral head avascular necrosis and present its etiopathogenesis, diagnostic and
treatment options.
Methods. A literature review was performed on PubMed using the keywords “avascular necrosis,” “femoral
head,” and “osteonecrosis,” focusing on articles published in the last 12 years, excluding non-English and those
centered solely on surgical treatments.
Results. Fractures of femur and hip dislocations are the most frequent traumatic causes of avascular necrosis.
Cortisone-like drugs and excessive spiritis consumption were traditionally viewed as the primary contributing
factors for emerging avascular necrosis. Recent studies emphasize impaired angiogenesis, coagulopathy and
endothelial dysfunction as significant risk factors. Magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard for
diagnosis, while nuclear diagnostic methods are used for predicting prognosis. Biphosphonates, statins,
vasodilators prove to be effective but remain to be prescribed without guidelines. For patients with early disease,
it is commanly recommended to do decompression of femoral head core.
Conclusions. Impaired angiogenesis, coagulopathy and endothelial dysfunction are identified as predisposing
factors for AVN. Pharmacotherapy and core decompression are effective therapies for low stage disease.
Keywords: avascular, femur, head, necrosis, osteonecrosis.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
Medical Sciences 2025 Vol. 13 (1), p. 7-15, https://doi.org/10.53453/ms.2025.1.2
7
1. Introduction
Aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, clinically
known as avascular necrosis, is a progressive
degenerative disorder characterized by the gradual
deterioration of bone tissue, which is primarily
initiated by a significant reduction in blood flow to
the subchondral bone (1,2). Reduction of blood flow
leads to a cascade of cellular events that compromise
bone integrity, function and inability to remodel
over time, which can cause structural collapse of the
femoral head and subsequent joint dysfunction
(1,2,3). This vascular compromise leads to the death
of osteocytes and culminates in bone tissue necrosis
without infection (2). The pathogenesis of AVN is
multifactorial and complex, with exact mechanisms
remaining unclear (3). Recognized risk factors for
avascular necrosis include chronic excessive spiritrs
consumption, long-term use of steroids, and a range
of underlying medical conditions such as systemic
lupus erythematosus, sickle cell disease,
coagulopathies, and malignancies (2,4). Additio-
nally, interventions like high-dose radiation therapy
and previous surgical procedures on the hip joint can
significantly contribute to the development of this
condition (2,3). AVN typically manifests in
physically active individuals aged 20 to 40 (1,4).
Interestingly, AVN is one of the leading causes of
total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50
years old (3, 4). Traumatic events, such as displaced
femoral neck fractures or hip dislocations, can
precipitate AVN by disrupting blood flow through
the lateral epiphyseal vessels (4). Displaced
fractures, which cause significant disruption to the
vascular supply of the femoral head, show more than
double the risk of developing avascular necrosis
(AVN) compared to non-displaced fractures, with
AVN occurring in approximately 15% of displaced
cases versus around 6% of non-displaced ones (5).
Non-traumatic AVN, on the other hand, is frequently
linked to high corticosteroid doses and chronic
alcohol abuse (6). The increase in AVN cases during
the COVID-19 pandemic has been linked to the
widespread administration of high-dose
corticosteroids such as prednisolone (7). Research
has shown that corticosteroid doses exceeding 2
grams of prednisone equivalent per day are
associated with a prevalence of AVN in
approximately 67 out of 1,000 individuals (7).
Furthermore, each 10 mg/day increase in
corticosteroid dosage raises the risk of developing
AVN by 3.6% (7). The role of alcohol in the
development of AVN, though not fully elucidated, is
significant, with alcohol abuse accounting for 20–
30% of cases (1,7). Chronic alcohol consumption is
believed to contribute to AVN by increasing
intracellular triglyceride accumulation, leading to
osteocyte pyknosis and diminished bone formation
by promoting the differentiation of stromal cells into
adipocytes (8). Despite these identified risk factors,
approximately 30% of non-traumatic AVN cases
remain idiopathic (1). This uncertainty has led to
investigations into the molecular pathology of AVN,
revealing that impaired angiogenesis,
coagulopathies, and endothelial dysfunction play
crucial roles in disease progression (9). These
findings have introduced new therapeutic
opportunities, particularly in early-stage AVN.
Pharmacological agents like bisphosphonates,
statins, and vasodilators are currently being explored
as potential treatments, although there are no
standardized guidelines for their use (8). Surgical
interventions for AVN vary based on the stage of the
disease. Joint-preserving procedures, such as core
decompression and osteotomy, are generally
recommended for younger patients in the pre-
collapse stage (2,8). These techniques aim to delay
the need for total joint replacement by slowing
disease progression (8). However, in advanced cases
where the femoral head has already collapsed and
joint integrity is significantly compromised, total hip
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
8
arthroplasty (THA) remains the definitive treatment
(8).
2. Methods
A comprehensive literature review was performed
utilizing the PubMed database, employing the
search terms “avascular necrosis,” “femoral head,”
“pharmacotherapy,” and “osteonecrosis.” The
analysis focused on English-language articles
published within the last decade (2014-2024). After
applying the established inclusion criteria, a total of
39 scientific articles were deemed suitable for this
review. This systematic approach ensures a robust
evaluation of the current understanding and
advancements in the pharmacological management
of avascular necrosis.
3. Results
3.1. Etiopathogenesis
Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a
multifactorial condition, with its precise
pathomechanism still not fully elucidated (3). The
onset of AVN is believed to stem from various
factors, including underlying medical conditions,
genetic predispositions or even some medications,
which collectively increase the risk of vascular
impairment and bone ischemia (10). In adults, the
femoral head's primary vascular supply originates
from the rami circumflexi medialis et lateralis of the
arteria profunda femoris, branching from the arteria
femoralis (12). These vessels are crucial for
sustaining the subchondral bone and cartilage, with
the medial circumflex artery being particularly
important, as it supplies the majority of the femoral
head (3). Disruption of this delicate microvascular
network, whether due to trauma, thrombosis, or
other pathological mechanisms, can rapidly
compromise the oxygenation and nutrient delivery
to osteocytes, setting the stage for ischemic bone
necrosis and subsequent joint degeneration (12). The
obstruction of these subchondral microcirculatory
pathways, particularly the retinacular vessels, is
often responsible for ischemia and osteonecrosis
(11). If left untreated, AVN has been reported to
cause secondary degenerative osteoarthritis in
approximately 68-81% of patients, often resulting in
significant hip mobility limitations due to
accumulated microfractures within the necrotic bone
(12). Various systemic diseases increase
susceptibility to AVN by impairing oxygen and
nutrient supply to osteocytes, leading to chronic
bone ischemia (1). Hemoglobin disorders, including
sickle cell disease and Gaucher’s disease, along with
other anemias, reduce the blood’s oxygen-carrying
efficiency, contributing to chronic bone ischemia
and subsequent necrosis (2,13,15). Non-traumatic
triggers of AVN, such as prolonged corticosteroid
use and chronic alcohol consumption, are linked to
dysregulated adipogenesis (6,7). This process
involves an increase in adipocyte size and number,
culminating in accumulation of lipids inside the
cells. The resulting rise in intramedullary pressure
compresses surrounding blood vessels and
promoting vascular damage what initiates a chain of
pathological changes, including coagulopathy and
ischemia. (6). New insights into AVN research point
to the vital roles played by defective angiogenesis,
blood clotting disorders, and endothelial
dysfunction in its development. A 2023 study
challenged traditional views by proposing that these
three mechanisms—collectively referred to as the
"molecular troika"—are central to AVN
development (17). Normally, angiogenesis
compensates for ischemic events by promoting new
blood vessel formation to re-establish tissue
perfusion (18). However, in AVN patients, this
process is impaired, resulting in insufficient and
abnormal neovascularization. The newly formed
vessels are often leaky and structurally defective,
leading to local edema and further aggravating
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
9
ischemia (18). The resultant failure to restore
adequate blood flow to the necrotic femoral head
initiates a cascade events that promotes joint to
collapse (18). Coagulopathy, another pivotal factor
in AVN, involves a disruption of the delicate balance
between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors.
This imbalance leads to excessive clot formation and
impaired thrombolysis, causing the formation of
intravascular thrombi that obstruct blood flow and
exacerbate tissue ischemia (19). What is more,
Endothelial dysfunction, characterized by
dysregulation between vasoconstriction and
vasodilation, hampers normal blood flow control
and exacerbates inflammation (2,4). Endothelial
cells fail to produce adequate amounts of vasoactive
molecules, leading to vascular dysregulation and
promoting a chronic pro-inflammatory state that
accelerates osteonecrosis (20). This triad of
angiogenesis impairment, coagulopathy, and
endothelial dysfunction has emerged as a critical
target for novel therapeutic approaches (1). Current
pharmacotherapy targets the restoration of
angiogenesis, improvement of anticoagulant
activity, and correction of endothelial dysfunction to
slow AVN progression. (21-23). These therapies
seek to address the fundamental pathophysiological
processes driving AVN progression, providing hope
for improved management strategies that may delay
or even prevent the need for invasive surgical
interventions such as total hip arthroplasty (24).
3.2. Diagnostics
Diagnosis of AVN combines clinical examination
findings with imaging studies. Patients typically
report progressive hip pain, stiffness, and crepitus,
often following a phase of minimal or intermittent
symptoms (3,9). Physical examination frequently
reveals restricted hip motion, with pain notably
exacerbated during forced internal rotation (3).
Prompt detection of AVN is key for better outcomes;
however, standard X-rays often fail to detect early-
stage changes. (25). Conversely, magnetic
resonance imaging is recognized as the definitive
method for diagnosing osteonecrosis, providing
highest sensitivity (90-95%) and specificity (85-
95%) in identifying early-stage avascular necrosis
(26.27). MRI can detect subtle early indicators,
including bone marrow edema and joint effusion in
the proximal femur, which are crucial for prognosis
and often invisible on computerized tomography
(CT) scans (25).
Though CT scans provide detailed images of bone
structures, their utility in early AVN diagnosis is
limited compared to MRI (27). In cases where joint
effusion or early marrow changes are suspected,
MRI is preferred due to its ability to visualize soft
tissue and early bone changes that precede
radiographic findings. Moreover, nuclear imaging
modalities such as single-photon emission
computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) have been
explored as diagnostic tools (25). A 2020 study
demonstrated that SPECT/CT is particularly useful
for determining AVN prognosis in patients over the
age of 58 with displaced femoral fractures, though it
offers less benefit in diagnosing AVN in younger or
middle-aged individuals without fractures (26). PET
and technetium bone scans may also help assess
AVN progression and severity, though their roles are
secondary to MRI, as they can help identify
metabolic activity and predict the extent of necrosis.
However, their use remains secondary to MRI for
most clinical situations (27). Recent advancements
in imaging have focused on diffusion-weighted MRI
and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, which offer
deeper insights into tissue perfusion and necrotic
bone activity (30). These imaging techniques can
enhance early diagnostic accuracy and aid in
treatment planning by enabling real-time assessment
of ischemic damage. Recent studies indicate that
integrating advanced imaging with biochemical
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
10
markers of bone turnover may improve diagnostic
and prognostic accuracy in AVN (31).
3.3. Treatment
Most AVN patients are middle-aged and lead active
lifestyles, which makes conservative treatment
options more favorable than surgical interventions
(10). The main goals of pharmacotherapy in AVN
management are to maintain hip function, delay
collapse of the femoral head, alleviate pain, and
slow necrotic progression. Various pharmacological
agents have been proposed, including
anticoagulants, statins, vasodilators, and
bisphosphonates, among others currently under
investigation (3). However, the efficacy of these
treatments remains limited, and no definitive
guidelines for their use have been established due to
the lack of robust evidence from clinical trials (34).
While bisphosphonates, which inhibit osteoclast
activity to reduce bone resorption, have been tested,
results from clinical trials have been inconsistent.
While some trials suggest that bisphosphonates may
slow down the progression of AVN by preventing
bone degradation, the overall evidence remains
inconclusive, making it difficult to establish
standardized recommendations regarding the dosage
and duration of treatment (34). Similarly, other
pharmacological agents such as anticoagulants and
statins have yielded inconsistent outcomes when
tested in AVN populations (34). Despite these
efforts, many patients eventually progress to the
point where surgical intervention becomes
necessary. An interesting area of research is
extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), which
has gained attention for its potential to promote
tissue regeneration and relieve pain. Several studies
published in 2015 demonstrated promising results,
with some subjects even showing complete
regression of MRI-detected necrotic changes after
ESWT (1). However, despite these optimistic
findings, a large proportion of AVN patients treated
with pharmacotherapy eventually require surgical
intervention. Surgical management of AVN
typically involves joint-preserving procedures for
younger patients in the pre-collapse stages of the
disease, while total hip arthroplasty (THA) is
reserved for patients with advanced-stage AVN and
significant femoral head collapse. Core
decompression is the most frequently utilized joint-
sparing technique for adressing early-stage
avascular necrosis (2). This procedure involves the
removal of a core of bone from the affected area,
which helps reduce intraosseous pressure, enhances
blood flow, and promotes healing within the necrotic
region. By facilitating better vascularization, core
decompression can slow the progression of AVN and
potentially delay or prevent the need for total joint
replacement (9). As a first-line treatment, it is
particularly effective when initiated during the early
stages of the disease, where intervention can lead to
favorable outcomes for patients (2). The principle
behind CD is to relieve intraosseous pressure within
the femoral head and restore blood flow by drilling
into the necrotic bone, thus facilitating new blood
vessel formation. This technique is cost-effective
and has demonstrated favorable long-term
outcomes, with clinical improvements observed in
many patients Over time, the procedure has evolved
to include multiple drilling, which has shown greater
efficacy in reducing intraosseous pressure and
enhancing revascularization (6).
However, recent studies suggest that vascularized
bone grafts, particularly vascularized fibular grafts,
may offer superior outcomes compared to their
nonvascularized counterparts due to the enhanced
blood supply they provide to the affected area (13).
Osteotomies, which involve cutting and realigning
the bone to redistribute weight-bearing forces, are
generally not recommended in AVN treatment
because they can lead to joint instability and
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
11
accelerate the development of arthritis (3). For
patients with advanced disease and femoral head
collapse, THA remains the definitive treatment
option, offering significant improvements in pain
relief and joint function.
3.4. Novel treatment options
Since 2010, research has focused on mesenchymal
stem cell (MSC) therapies as a potential treatment
for AVN (13). Since then, there has been growing
interest in this therapeutic approach, with multiple
studies focusing on intralesional autologous bone
marrow-derived MSC therapies for femoral head
osteonecrosis. A 2023 meta-analysis of 18 studies
confirmed that MSC-based therapies support
revascularization and promote bone tissue
regeneration., as well as providing improved
functional outcomes and reduced pain, as measured
by functional scores and visual analog scales (18).
Due to their regenerative properties, MSCs present
a promising therapeutic option for early-stage AVN,
potentially delaying the need for surgery.
Moreover, advances in the understanding of MSC
biology have led to innovative approaches that may
enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs. For
example, a study by Zhao et al. demonstrated that
pretreating MSCs with angiotensin II significantly
enhances their ability to promote angiogenesis in the
femoral head, suggesting that MSCs’ therapeutic
potential can be augmented by manipulating their
microenvironment or priming them with specific
agents (18). In this context, angiotensin II may
boost the production of angiogenic factors like
VEGF, thereby promoting neovascularization and
improving blood supply to the necrotic tissue.
These developments highlight the future potential of
MSC therapies in tissue engineering, suggesting that
recent advances are progressively moving toward a
clinically viable and effective solution for AVN.
However, while the promise of MSC therapy is
evident, more extensive clinical trials are needed to
determine optimal cell delivery methods, dosages,
and the long-term safety of these interventions
before they can become a mainstream treatment
option.
3.5. Conclusions
The pathophysiological processes associated with
avascular necrosis of the femoral head are intricate
and involve several interrelated factors. The primary
factors involved are diminished angiogenesis,
coagulation disorders, and endothelial dysfunction,
all of which lead to ischemia and bone necrosis.
These mechanisms contribute to the ischemia and
subsequent bone necrosis that characterize the
disease. While conservative approaches like
pharmacotherapy and shockwave therapy show
promise for early-stage AVN, their success rates
vary, and many patients eventually require surgical
intervention. Core decompression and vascularized
bone grafting represent key surgical options aimed
at preserving joint function in earlier disease stages,
while total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the treatment
of choice for advanced cases. Recent advances in
stem cell therapies, particularly with mesenchymal
stem cells (MSCs), offer promising new avenues for
tissue regeneration and revascularization. However,
more research is necessary to establish MSCs as a
viable treatment option, with further clinical trials
needed to optimize protocols and assess long-term
outcomes. The future of AVN management may
increasingly involve a combination of innovative
medical therapies and established surgical
techniques to improve patient outcomes.
References
1. Narayanan A, Khanchandani P, Borkar
RM, Ambati CR, Roy A, Han X, Bhoskar RN,
Ragampeta S, Gannon F, Mysorekar V, Karanam B,
V SM, Sivaramakrishnan V. Avascular Necrosis of
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
12
Femoral Head: A Metabolomic, Biophysical,
Biochemical, Electron Microscopic and
Histopathological Characterization. Sci Rep. 2017
Sep 6;7(1):10721.
2. George G, Lane JM. Osteonecrosis of the
Femoral Head. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res
Rev. 2022 May 1;6(5):e21.00176.
3. Narayanan A, Khanchandani P, Borkar
RM, Ambati CR, Roy A, Han X, et al. Avascular
necrosis of femoral head: A metabolomic,
biophysical, biochemical, electron microscopic and
histopathological characterization. Sci Rep
[Internet]. 2017;7(1):10721.
4. Baharum NN, Ariffin F, Hanafiah M,
Sulaiman SH. Avascular necrosis of the hip in
primary care. Korean J Fam Med [Internet].
2020;42(1):84–7. Available from: 21
5. Slobogean GP, Sprague SA, Scott T,
Bhandari M. Complications following young
femoral neck fractures. Injury. 2015 Mar;46(3):484-
91.
6. Bachiller FG-C, Caballer AP, Portal LF.
Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral
neck fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet].
2014;(399):87–109. Available from:
7. Hassan AAA, Khalifa AA. Femoral head
avascular necrosis in COVID-19 survivors: a
systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2023
Sep;43(9):1583-1595.
8. Mont MA, Pivec R, Banerjee S, Issa K,
Elmallah RK, Jones LC. High-Dose Corticosteroid
Use and Risk of Hip Osteonecrosis: Meta-Analysis
and Systematic Literature Review. J Arthroplasty.
2015 Sep;30(9):1506-1512.e5.
9. Leandro MP, De Sá CKC, Filho DPS, De
Souza LAA, Salles C, Tenório MCC, et al.
Association and risk factors of osteonecrosis of
femoral head in sickle cell disease: A systematic
review. Indian J Orthop [Internet]. 2021;56(2):216–
25.
10. Singh, M.; Singh, B.; Sharma, K.; Kumar,
N.; Mastana, S.; Singh, P. A Molecular Troika of
Angiogenesis, Coagulopathy and Endothelial
Dysfunction in the Pathology of Avascular Necrosis
of Femoral Head: A Comprehensive
Review. Cells 2023, 12, 2278.
11. Guggenbuhl, P., et al. "Etiology of
avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral
head." Morphologie 105.349 (2021): 80-84.
12. Zlotorowicz M, Czubak-Wrzosek M,
Wrzosek P, Czubak J. The origin of the medial
femoral circumflex artery, lateral femoral
circumflex artery and obturator artery. Surg Radiol
Anat. 2018 May;40(5):515-520.
13. Migliorini F, La Padula G, Oliva F,
Torsiello E, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N. Operative
management of avascular necrosis of the femoral
head in skeletally immature patients: A systematic
review. Life (Basel) [Internet]. 2022;12(2)
14. Leandro MP, De Sá CKC, Filho DPS, De
Souza LAA, Salles C, Tenório MCC, Paz CLDSL,
Matos MAA. Association and Risk Factors of
Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head in Sickle Cell
Disease: A Systematic Review. Indian J Orthop.
2021 Aug 4;56(2):216-225
15. Noureldine MHA, Taher AT, Haydar AA,
Berjawi A, Khamashta MA, Uthman I.
Rheumatological complications of beta-
thalassaemia: an overview. Rheumatology (Oxford).
2018 Jan 1;57(1):19-27.
16. Wen Z, Li Y, Cai Z, Fan M, Wang J, Ding
R, et al. Global trends and current status in
osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A bibliometric
analysis of publications in the last 30 years. Front
Endocrinol (Lausanne) [Internet]. 2022;13:897439
17. Shah KN, Racine J, Jones LC, Aaron RK.
Pathophysiology and risk factors for osteonecrosis.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med [Internet].
2015;8(3):201–9. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9277-8
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
13
18. Diri D, Alasaad H, Muhammed H, Ibrahim
J. Case report: adipose-derived mesenchymal stem
cells combined with core decompression in the
treatment of early-stage avascular necrosis of the
femoral head. Int J Surg Case Rep [Internet].
2022;102:107861.
19. Palta, S.; Saroa, R.; Palta, A. Overview of
the Coagulation System. Indian J.
Anaesth. 2014, 58, 515–523.
20. Shao W, Wang P, Lv X, Wang B, Gong S,
Feng Y. Unraveling the Role of Endothelial
Dysfunction in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head:
A Pathway to New Therapies. Biomedicines. 2024
Mar 15;12(3):664.
21. Li, M.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.; Cao, S.; Zhou,
Y.; Ou, X.; He, M.; Cai, H.; Dai, W.; Yuan, D.; et al.
Therapeutic Assessment of Crystalloid Fluid
Resuscitation in Experimental Military Injury. Curr.
Pharm. Biotechnol. 2023, 25, 93–101.
22. Chen, C.; Fu, L.; Luo, Y.; Zeng, W.; Qi, X.;
Wei, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhao, X.; Li, D.; Tian, M.; et al.
Engineered Exosome-Functionalized Extracellular
Matrix-Mimicking Hydrogel for Promoting Bone
Repair in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteonecrosis of
the Femoral Head. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 2023, 15, 28891–28906.
23. Guo, M.; Zhang, J. Vitamin B2 Prevents
Glucocorticoid-Caused Damage of Blood Vessels in
Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. BioMed Res.
Int. 2022, 2022, 4006184.
24. Ren, P.; Lu, L.; Cai, S.; Chen, J.; Lin, W.;
Han, F. Alternative Splicing: A New Cause and
Potential Therapeutic Target in Autoimmune
Disease. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 713540.
25. Sodhi N, Acuna A, Etcheson J, Mohamed
N, Davila I, Ehiorobo JO, et al. Management of
osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Bone Joint J
[Internet]. 2020;102-B(7_Supple_B):122–8.
26. Zhao, Dewei, et al. "Guidelines for clinical
diagnosis and treatment of osteonecrosis of the
femoral head in adults (2019 version)." Journal of
orthopaedic translation 21 (2020): 100-110.
27. Choi H-R, Steinberg ME, Y Cheng E.
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: diagnosis and
classification systems. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
[Internet]. 2015;8(3):210–20. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9278-7
28. Ozgonenel L, Yesil H, Yesil M. Use of
ESWT in avascular necrosis of bilateral femoral
heads: case report. North Clin Istanb [Internet].
2014;1(2):117–20.
29. Cheng J-H, Jhan S-W, Hsu C-C, Chiu H-W,
Hsu S-L. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy
modulates the expressions of proinflammatory
cytokines IL33 and IL17A, and their receptors ST2
and IL17RA, within the articular cartilage in early
avascular necrosis of the femoral head in a rat
model. Mediators Inflamm [Internet].
2021;2021:9915877.
30. Andronic O, Shoman H, Weiss O,
Khanduja V. What are the outcomes of core
decompression in patients with avascular necrosis?
Protocol for a systematic review. F1000Res
[Internet]. 2020;9:71.
31. Ji Q, Li X, Luo S, Geng L, Ren P, Ni M,
Zheng Q, Xin P, Wang Y, Zhang G. Long-term
outcomes of arthroscopic synovectomy and core
decompression through multiple small bone holes
for early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral
head. Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr 1;5(1):17.
32. Pierce TP, Jauregui JJ, Elmallah RK,
Lavernia CJ, Mont MA, Nace J. A current review of
core decompression in the treatment of
osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Curr Rev
Musculoskelet Med [Internet]. 2015;8(3):228–32.
33. .Manenti G, Altobelli S, Pugliese L,
Tarantino U. The role of imaging in diagnosis and
management of femoral head avascular necrosis.
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab [Internet].
2016;12(Suppl 1):31–8.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
14
34. Ha J-S, Cho H-M, Lee H-J, Kim S-D.
Bilateral avascular necrosis of the femoral head in a
patient with asymptomatic adrenal incidentaloma.
Hip Pelvis [Internet]. 2019;31(2):120–3..
35. Sultan AA, Khlopas A, Surace P, Samuel
LT, Faour M, Sodhi N, Krebs VE, Stearns KL,
Molloy RM, Mont MA. The use of non-vascularized
bone grafts to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral
head: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Int
Orthop. 2019 Jun;43(6):1315-1320.
36. Richard MJ, DiPrinzio EV, Lorenzana DJ,
Whitlock KG, Hein RE, Urbaniak JR. Outcomes of
free vascularized fibular graft for post-traumatic
osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Injury. 2021
Dec;52(12):3653-3659.
37. Lohiya A Jr, Dhaniwala N, Dudhekar U,
Goyal S, Patel SK. A comprehensive review of
treatment strategies for early avascular necrosis.
Cureus [Internet]. 2023;15(12):e50510.
38. Saini U, Jindal K, Rana A, Aggarwal S,
Kumar P, Sharma S. Core decompression combined
with intralesional autologous bone marrow derived
cell therapies for osteonecrosis of the femoral head
in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Surgeon. 2023 Jun;21(3):e104-e117.
39. Zhao J, He W, Zheng H, Zhang R, Yang H.
Bone Regeneration and Angiogenesis by Co-
transplantation of Angiotensin II-Pretreated
Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Endothelial Cells in
Early Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral
Head. Cell Transplant. 2022 Jan-
Dec;31:9636897221086965.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 26 Jan, 2025 - Volume 13 | Issue 1. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
15