Retinopathy of prematurity – a review of pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnostics, classification, and management

Full article

https://doi.org/10.53453/ms.2026.6.8

Retinopathy of prematurity: a review of pathogenesis, risk factors,
diagnostics, classification, and management
Kristupas Bartuška
1
, Greta Miškinaitė
1
, Dalia Jarušaitienė
2
1
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Department of
Ophthalmology, Kaunas, Lithuania
Abstract
Background. Retinopathy of prematurity is a disease of the immature retinal blood vessels in preterm, lowbirth-
weight infants that can progress to retinal detachment and irreversible visual impairment.
Aim. To evaluate current knowledge on retinopathy of prematurity, including pathogenesis, diagnostics, risk
factors, classification and management.
Material and Methods. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed database, focusing
on English-language studies. Articles published in English were included in the analysis. Studies were selected
based on relevance to pathogenesis, diagnostics, risk factors, classification and treatment.
Results. ROP remains a significant complication of prematurity: interrupted VEGF-driven vascularization causes
early vessel loss followed by hypoxia-driven neovascularization. Major risk factors - low gestational age and birth
weight, unstable oxygenation, infection, blood transfusions, and inadequate nutrition - help determine which
infants need treatment. Laser, intravitreal anti-VEGF, and vitreoretinal surgery can improve structural outcomes
but carry risks of late recurrence and long-term visual impairment.
Conclusion. Primary prevention (careful oxygen management, antenatal steroids, optimized nutrition and
infection control) combined with timely, risk-based screening is essential to lower ROP burden. Although current
treatment methods improve anatomical outcomes, prolonged follow-up - particularly after anti-VEGF therapy - is
necessary, along with further research into phase-specific biological therapies and safer systemic strategies to
improve long-term visual and developmental outcomes.
Keywords: retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), preterm infants, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), retinal
neovascularization, risk factors, screening, laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF therapy, vitreoretinal surgery.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
Medical Sciences 2026 Vol. 14 (4), p. 79-99, https://doi.org/10.53453/ms.2026.6.8
79
Neišnešiotų naujagimių retinopatija: patogenezės, diagnostikos,
rizikos veiksnių, klasifikacijos ir gydymo apžvalga
Kristupas Bartuška
1
, Greta Miškinaitė
1
, Dalia Jarušaitienė
2
1
Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas, Medicinos fakultetas, Kaunas, Lietuva
2
Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas, Medicinos akademija, Medicinos fakultetas, Akių ligų klinika, Kaunas,
Lietuva
Santrauka
Įvadas. Neišnešiotų naujagimių retinopatija (NNR) yra neišsivysčiustinklainės kraujagyslių liga, pasireiškianti
neišnešiotiems mažo gimimo svorio naujagimiams, kuri gali progresuoti iki tinklainės atšokos ir negrįžtamo regos
praradimo.
Tyrimo tikslas. Atlikti išsamią apžvalgą vertinant esamas žinias apie neišnešiotų naujagimių retinopatija,
įskaitant patogenezę, diagnostiką, rizikos veiksnius, klasifikaciją ir gydymą.
Medžiaga ir metodai. Išsamiai išanalizuota mokslinė literatūra, pasitelkus PubMed duomenų bazę. Buvo
analizuoti anglų kalba publikuoti straipsniai. Atrinkti straipsniai buvo vertinami pagal jų svarbą patofiziologijos,
diagnostikos, rizikos veiksnių, klasifikacijos ir gydymo sričiai.
Rezultatai. NNR išlieka viena svarbiausių neišnešiotų naujagimkomplikacijų: sutrikusi VEGF reguliuojamas
kraujagyslių formavimosi procesas sukelia ankstyvą kraujagyslių nykimą, po kurio pasireiškia hipoksijos sukelta
patologinė neovaskuliarizacija. Pagrindiniai rizikos veiksniai - mažas gestacinis amžius ir gimimo svoris,
nestabilus įsotinimas deguonimi, infekcijos, kraujo perpylimai ir nepakankama mityba - padeda nustatyti, kuriems
kūdikiams reikalingas gydymas. Lazerinė fotokoaguliacija, intravitrealinės anti-VEGF injekcijos ir
vitreoretinalinė chirurgija gali pagerinti struktūrinius rezultatus, tačiau taikymas siejamas su skirtingomis
rizikomis, įskaitant vėlyvą ligos reaktyvaciją po anti-VEGF terapijos ir ribotus ilgalaikius regos rezultatus
pažengusiose stadijose.
Išvados. Pirminė prevencija (tikslus deguonies kiekio valdymas, antenataliniai kortikosteroidai, tinkama mityba
ir infekcijų kontrolė), derinama kartu su laiku atliekamais, riziką pagrįstais patikrinimais. Nors dabartiniai gydymo
metodai gerina anatominius rezultatus, būtinas ilgesnis stebėjimas (ypatingai po anti-VEGF gydymo) ir papildomi
tyrimai, dėl fazėms pritaikytų biologinių terapijų bei saugesnių sisteminių strategijų, kad būtų pagerinti ilgalaikiai
regėjimo ir raidos rezultatai.
Raktažodžiai: NNR, neišnešiotų naujagimių retinopatija, kraujagyslių endotelio augimo faktorius (VEGF),
neovaskuliarizacija, rizikos veiksniai, lazerinė fotokoaguliacija, anti-VEGF terapija, vitreoretinalinė chirurgija
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
80
1. Introduction
Approximately one in ten infants in United States is
born prematurely, that is, before 37 weeks of
gestation, whereas rates are lower in Europe, raging
from 5 % to 8 %. In the United States, prematurity
and its related complications are major contributors
to neonatal health problems, including retinopathy
of prematurity (ROP) [1]. ROP is a disorder of the
developing retinal blood vessels that primarily
affects premature, low-birth-weight infants and may
progress to retinal detachment and significant visual
impairment or blindness [2,3]. In full-term infants,
the retina and its vasculature are usually fully
developed, development of ROP highly unlikely. In
contrast, preterm birth interrupts normal retinal
maturation, and the earlier the infant is born, the
more underdeveloped the retina is at birth [4].
The condition was first recognized over 80 years ago
under the name retrolental fibroplasia. In the
following decade, it became a major cause of
childhood blindness in the United States,
particularly among infants with very low birth
weight [5]. Today, ROP is understood as a complex
disease arising from disrupted retinal vascular
development. Its pathogenesis is influenced by
multiple factors, including fluctuations in oxygen
levels and inadequate nutritional support, both of
which affect the fragile, immature retinal circulation
[6].
ROP is categorized based on the location of retinal
involvement (zones IIII) and the extent of disease
severity (stages 15). More advanced or high-risk
forms (type 1 ROP) require prompt treatment,
typically with laser photocoagulation or intravitreal
anti-VEGF injections, while less severe cases (type
2 ROP) are carefully observed for possible
spontaneous regression [1]. The primary aim of
screening programs is to detect disease early and
prevent progression to stages 4 and 5, which involve
partial or total retinal detachment and are associated
with worse visual outcomes. Nevertheless, even in
these advanced stages, surgical intervention may
still offer visual benefit in selected cases [7]. Early
detection and timely treatment are critical to prevent
progression to retinal detachment and permanent
vision loss [1].
It has been found that the incidence of ROP among
preterm infants has markedly increased in recent
decades. This rise places a substantial clinical and
economic burden on the healthcare system, as ROP
is associated with increased morbidity and mortality
and higher medical costs in early life [8].
2. Material and Methods.
A literature review was conducted using the
PubMed database to identify peer-reviewed English-
language publications on retinopathy of prematurity.
The search focused primarily on articles published
between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2025,
while selected older landmark sources were
additionally included to provide essential historical
and pathophysiological context. Search terms and
their combinations included: “retinopathy of
prematurity”, “ROP”, “pathogenesis”, “risk
factors”, “screening”, diagnosis”, “classification”,
“ICROP”, “oxygen therapy”, “telemedicine”, “anti-
VEGF”, “laser photocoagulation”, and
“vitrectomy”. Publications were included if they
addressed at least one of the following topics:
pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis and screening,
classification, differential diagnosis, prevention,
prognosis, or management of ROP. Narrative
reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical
studies, cohort studies, randomized trials, and
relevant guideline-based publications were
considered. Exclusion criteria were non-English
publications, articles without accessible full text,
non-peer-reviewed sources, and studies not directly
related to the scope of the review. Approximately 75
% of the selected literature consisted of studies
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
81
published within the last 10 years, whereas the
remaining sources were older articles included for
contextual relevance.
3. Results
3.1. Pathogenesis
Vasculogenesis begins at the optic disc around 12
weeks gestation and extends outward until at least
22 weeks. Vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) driven angiogenesis, supported in part by
VEGF secretion from retinal pigment epithelium
(RPR), completes peripheral retinal vascularization
by 40 - 44 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA),
therefore prematurity interrupts retinal vascular
development during this critical process [3,9].
The two-phase hypothesis of retinopathy of
prematurity (ROP) pathogenesis is essential in
screening and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
management by pediatricians, as well as staging and
treatment decisions made by ophthalmologists
(Figure 1). Phase I, immediately after birth, is
characterized by delayed retinal vascularization with
vessel attenuation and regression, attributed to
prematurity - related stress, extrauterine hyperoxia,
low insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and
reduced vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
2 (VEGFR-2) expression. Phase II (around 4 - 8
weeks postnatal) is marked by peripheral retinal
hypoxia that raises hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF)
and induces transcription of angiogenic factors
(vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),
erythropoietin (EPO) and IGF-1), driving
pathological neovascularization that, in severe
cases, may result in retinal detachment and
permanent vision loss. Gestational age and birth
weight are major risk factors for ROP, with oxygen
exposure also playing a critical role. Paediatricians
must therefore manage target oxygenation during
initial resuscitation and the NICU growth period,
while ophthalmologists time screening, stage the
disease, and select/titrate treatments based on the
evolving two-phase pathophysiology [3,911].
Figure 1. Phase I and II of ROP [3]
ROP - retinopathy of prematurity; IGF-1 - insulin-like growth factor 1; VEGFR-2 - vascular endothelial growth
factor receptor 2; HIF - hypoxia-inducible factor; VEGF - vascular endothelial growth factor; EPO -
erythropoietin.
Oxidative and nitrosative stress contribute to the
early obliterative phase of ROP by stabilizing HIF-
and activating pro-angiogenic and inflammatory
pathways, including VEGF and JAK/STAT
signaling. In this context, oxidative stress also
increases arginase activity, which competes with
nitric oxide synthase (NOS) for L-arginine, leading
to NOS uncoupling and further amplification of
oxidative stress and inflammation. Arginase 2 has
been linked to ischemic retinal neurovascular injury,
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
82
whereas arginase 1, expressed by anti-inflammatory
M2 macrophages, helps reduce oxidative stress and
inflammation. Although targeting ROS/NO
signaling and arginase pathways represents a
promising therapeutic approach, current evidence
remains limited, and further preclinical and clinical
studies are required to confirm safety and efficacy
[3,9,12,13].
Hypoxia - inducible factor (HIF) mediates cellular
adaptation to hypoxia: stabilizing HIF in Phase I
(hypoxiamimesis) may prevent retinal vessel loss,
whereas HIF inhibition in Phase II could suppress
pathological pro-angiogenic signalling (Table 1)
[3,9,14].
Table 1. Molecular Factors in the Pathophysiology of ROP
Type
Role in ROP
EPO
Low in phase 1 → impaired normal vascular growth
High in phase 2 → promotes pathological neovascularization
IGF-1
Required for VEGF-driven angiogenesis
Low levels in preterm infants increase ROP risk
RPE (retinal
pigment
epithelium)
Tight epithelial layer maintaining the bloodretinal barrier and protecting the retina
from oxidative stress.
PEDF
RPE - secreted serpin with strong anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects
PLGF
VEGF-A homolog mainly linked to pathological angiogenesis
Inhibited by aflibercept, though its therapeutic benefit remains uncertain
Ang-2
Hypoxia/VEGF-induced factor that destabilizes vessels and drives pathological
neovascularization
Combined Ang-2+VEGF inhibition is superior to anti-VEGF monotherapy
EPO - erythropoietin; IGF-1 - insulin-like growth factor 1; RPE - retinal pigment epithelium; PEDF - pigment
epithelium-derived factor; PLGF - placental growth factor; VEGF - vascular endothelial growth factor; Ang-2 -
angiopoietin-2; ROP - retinopathy of prematurity.
3.2. Risk factors
Several maternal, prenatal, and perinatal factors
contribute to the development of retinopathy of
prematurity (ROP). The most significant risk factors
are low birth weight, low gestational age, and
exposure to high or unstable oxygen levels during
the neonatal period. The likelihood of severe ROP
increases with decreasing birth weight and
gestational age. Episodes of intermittent hypoxia
(SpO₂ <80 % for at least 1 minute) and large oxygen
fluctuations have also been associated with an
increased risk of ROP [3,15,16].
Maintaining appropriate oxygen saturation is central
to ROP prevention in the NICU, as early hyperoxia
(e.g., resuscitation with 100 % oxygen) increases
ROP risk. The Neonatal Oxygen Prospective Meta-
Analysis showed that lower oxygen targets (8589
%) reduce severe ROP but increase mortality
compared with higher targets (9195 %) [17].
According to the two-phase model of ROP, avoiding
hyperoxia early in life (until ~3032 weeks
postmenstrual age) reduces ROP risk, while
preventing hypoxia after this period may also
decrease the risk [18]. Antenatal corticosteroid
exposure is associated with a reduced risk of severe
ROP, and a prospective cohort by Travers et al
reported lower rates of severe ROP among infants
born at 2330 weeks of gestational age who received
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
83
these steroids [19]. Optimizing parenteral nutrition
lowers the risk of ROP at any stage, and
observational studies suggest that vitamin E or
inositol supplementation and breastfeeding may
further reduce the risk of severe disease [20].
Ana C. Almeida and colleagues, in their study
“Incidence and Risk Factors for Retinopathy of
Prematurity in a Portuguese Cohort”, reported that
hyperglycemia was the most significant risk factor
for ROP, exceeding the influence of other variables.
Although severe ROP occurred less frequently in
more mature infants, it was still observed. These
infants shared similar risk factors with extremely
preterm neonates, while bronchopulmonary
dysplasia appeared to play a more prominent role
[21].
Antenatal inflammation is considered an important
contributor to the development of severe retinopathy
of prematurity. Preterm infants exposed to
chorioamnionitis have a higher likelihood of
developing aggressive posterior ROP and zone I
disease, and severe ROP has been associated with all
types of histologic chorioamnionitis as well as with
placental inflammation compared with placental
vasculopathy. Elevated maternal white blood cell
count has also been identified as an independent risk
factor. However evidence regarding the association
between histologic chorioamnionitis and ROP
remains inconsistent. Some studies report no
significant association while others suggest that the
combination of placental infection and inflammation
increases the risk of zone I ROP. In contrast one
study found that progression of acute histologic
chorioamnionitis in infants without fetal growth
restriction may have a protective effect [2225].
Postnatal infection is a major risk factor for
retinopathy of prematurity. Sepsis reduces retinal
perfusion and causes ischemia. It also promotes
intravascular microthrombi that obstruct vessels and
increase vascular permeability. Oxidative stress and
upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor 2
drive pathological neovascularisation and tissue
necrosis. Proinflammatory cytokines including
interleukin- and transforming growth factor-β
raise hypoxia-inducible factor- and amplify
angiogenesis. Neonatal fungal sepsis is
independently associated with threshold ROP in
very low birth weight infants between 1000 and
1500 grams, and Candida species have been linked
to higher rates of severe disease. Candida albicans
increases endothelial prostaglandin production,
raises vascular permeability, and impairs neutrophil
adherence, while Candida parapsilosis has been
associated with an even greater incidence of ROP
[2527].
Evidence suggests that necrotizing enterocolitis
contributes to a higher risk of retinopathy of
prematurity in preterm infants. This risk is more
pronounced in surgical cases and in early-onset NEC
occurring within the first four weeks of life [2528].
Preterm infants often require red blood cell
transfusions for severe anemia due to immature
hematopoiesis and frequent phlebotomy.
Transfusion of adult blood - rich in hemoglobin A,
which has lower oxygen affinity than fetal
hemoglobin - can increase retinal exposure to
hyperoxia and oxygen free radicals. A proof-of-
concept study found higher hemoglobin F levels
after cord blood transfusions and noted the most
severe retinopathy cases following adult blood
transfusion. Transfusions also elevate serum iron,
transferrin, and ferritin, promoting reactive oxygen
species production, lipid peroxidation, and
inflammatory responses. In addition, both the
severity and duration of anemia before transfusion
have been associated with increased risk of
retinopathy of prematurity, suggesting that
transfusion source, iron loading, and inflammation
all contribute to ROP risk [29,30].
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
84
Erythropoietin is given to reduce transfusion needs
in preterm and lowbirth-weight infants, but
because it is a hypoxia-sensitive pro-angiogenic
factor it may contribute to retinopathy of
prematurity [31]. Elevated endogenous EPO in the
first two postnatal weeks and some studies of
administered EPO have been associated with
increased or more severe ROP, although results are
inconsistent. The effect may depend on the disease
phase and on timing of treatment: pooled reviews
found no overall ROP increase with very early
initiation (<8 days), yet early administration has
been linked to higher ROP risk compared with later
initiation (828 days) (Table 2) [25,32,33].
Table 2. Risk factors for ROP
Period
Risk factor
Patophysiology
Association with ROP
Prenatal
Antenatal
corticosteroids
Promote organ maturation
Associated with reduced ROP
risk
Chorioamnionitis /
placental
inflammation
Prenatal inflammatory
cytokine exposure and
placental immune activation
Associated with severe ROP
(especially aggressive
posterior and zone I)
Perinatal
Low birth weight
Immature retinal vasculature
Strongest risk factor, risk
increases as weight decreases
Low gestational age
Incomplete retinal vascular
development
Higher risk of severe ROP
with a lower gestational age
Neonatal
Intermittent hypoxia
Retinal ischemia, oxidative
stress
Increases ROP risk
Early hyperoxia
Disrupts early vascular growth
(Phase I)
Increases ROP risk
Oxygen saturation
targets
Hypoxia and hyperoxia
imbalance
Lower targets reduce ROP but
may increase mortality
Optimized parental
nutrition
Supports growth and reduces
metabolic stress
Associated with reduced ROP
risk
Hyperglycemia
Metabolic and oxidative stress
Significant risk factor
Postnatal
Breastfeeding
Anti-inflammatory and
antioxidant effects
May reduce severe ROP risk
Sepsis
Reduced retinal perfusion,
ischemia, and
inflammatory/angiogenic
activation
Major risk factor for ROP
Fungal sepsis
Candida-related endothelial
injury, increased vascular
permeability, and pro-
angiogenic inflammation
Independently associated with
threshold and severe ROP,
especially in very low birth
weight infants
NEC
Systemic inflammatory stress
Increased ROP risk
Red blood cell
transfusions
Increased oxygen delivery and
oxidative stress from adult
blood and iron load
Associated with increased
ROP risk
Anemia
Prolonged tissue hypoxia
before transfusion
Associated with increased
ROP risk
Treatment - related
EPO
Hypoxia-sensitive pro-
angiogenic factor
May increase ROP risk
(evidence is inconsistent)
ROP - retinopathy of prematurity; NEC - necrotizing enterocolitis; EPO - erythropoietin.
3.3. Diagnosis and screening
The American Academy of Pediatrics and American
Academy of Ophthalmology recommends ROP
screening for all infants with a birth weight ≤1500 g
or a gestational age of 30 weeks or less, as
determined by the treating neonatologist.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
85
Additionally, infants weighing 15002000 g or born
after 30 weeks of gestation should also undergo
examination if the clinical team considers them at
increased risk. This applies particularly to infants
with marked clinical instability, including those who
needed cardiovascular support for low blood
pressure or extended oxygen administration without
adequate saturation monitoring [2]. ROP scree-ning
criteria vary between countries; while U.S.
guidelines recommend screening infants with a
gestational age of ≤30 weeks, several countries,
including the United Kingdom and some European
settings, apply broader criteria and screen infants
born at <32 weeks of gestation [3].
In addition to standard screening criteria, several
risk-based algorithms have been developed to
improve risk stratification and reduce the number of
unnecessary examinations. One such tool is the
weight, Insulin-like growth factor 1, Neonatal
Retinopathy Of Prematurity (WINROP) algorithm,
which uses postnatal weight gain to identify infants
at risk for severe ROP. Rather than replacing the
initial ophthalmological examination, WINROP
aims to identify low-risk infants who may require
fewer fallow-up examinations or earlier termination
of screening. However, its performance has varied
across different populations, which currently limits
its universal clinical applicability [3,34].
After determining which infants qualify for
screening, the next critical consideration is the
timing of the initial examination. The timing of the
first ROP examination is determined by
postmenstrual age, and clinicians should consider
beginning screening before 31 weeks’ postmenstrual
age in infants born before 24 weeks’ gestation or
with very low birth weight, as these infants may
develop pre-plus or plus disease earlier than older
preterm infants [35]. Conversely, in infants born at
≥27 weeks gestational age and ≥800 grams, data
from the FIRST-ROP algorithm suggest that
delaying the initial examination until 34 weeks
postmenstrual age can safely reduce the number of
inpatient examinations without missing treatment-
requiring ROP [36].
Traditionally, bedside binocular indirect
ophthalmoscopy (BIO) has been the standard
method for evaluating the premature retina [37].
Examinations are conducted after pharmaco-logic
pupil dilation and typically involve the use of a lid
speculum and, when necessary, scleral depression to
visualize the peripheral retina. Care must be taken
when administering dilating agents, as repeated
dosing may negatively affect the infant’s
cardiorespiratory and gastrointes-tinal stability, and
poor dilation itself may signal advanced disease [2].
The most widely used and safe mydriatic regimens
for ROP screening include phenylephrine (12.5 %)
combined with either cyclopentolate (0.2 %) or
tropicamide (0.5-1 %), typically administered as one
to two drops per eye, with a repeat dose after 5
minutes [37]. Recent evidence supports the use of
microdrop administration (6.5–7 μL), compared
with the standard drop volumes (28–34 μL), is
associated with fewer systemic adverse effects while
maintaining sufficient pupillary dila-tion [38].
Although essential, ROP examinations involving
scleral depression can be stressful and painful for
preterm infants, even when performed by
experienced ophthalmologists and supported by
standard topical anesthesia and comfort measures.
These procedures may also include physiological
instability, including tachycardia, oxygen
desaturation, hypertension, and an increased
frequency of apneic episodes during and for several
hours after the examination [39]. Topical
proparacaine 0.5 % administered 30 seconds before
the examination reduces pain, particularly during
speculum insertion. However, pain relief appears to
be greater when topical anesthesia is combined with
additional comfort measures, such as sweet
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
86
solutions, nonnutritive sucking, swaddling, or gentle
physical containment [40,41]. In modern neonatal
intensive care settings, however, only a minority of
screened infants approximately 510 % ultimately
require treatment [42].
Despite timely therapy, around 9 % of infants with
high-risk prethreshold disease may still develop
unfavorable structural outcomes, highlighting the
importance of early detection and careful follow-up
[37].
In recent years, telemedicine-based screening using
remote digital fundus imaging has gained increasing
attention. In this approach, wide-angle retinal
images are captured in the neonatal intensive care
unit and transmitted electronically for remote
interpretation by trained specialists. Studies have
demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for
detecting treatment-requiring ROP, making
telemedicine a valuable alternative in regions with
limited access to pediatric ophthalmologists. This
model also facilitates documentation, quality
assurance, and standardized grading [43]. Artificial
intelligence is increasingly being integrated into
telemedicine-based ROP screening as an
autonomous tool for analyzing remote wide-angle
fundus images. Recent multinational validation
studies have shown higher accuracy for detecting
more than mild and treatment-requiring ROP,
supporting its role as a triage adjunct in settings with
limited specialist availability, although clinical
follow-up remains essential [44].
During ROP screening, diagnosis is established
through detailed examination of the dilated retina.
The ophthalmologist evaluates the extent of retinal
vascular development and identifies the boundary
between vascularized and avascular retina.
Abnormal findings may include a demarcation line,
ridge formation, extraretinal fibrovascular
proliferation, or signs of vascular activity in the
posterior pole. Disease severity is classified
according to standardized criteria that describe the
retinal zone involved, the stage of pathologic
change, and the presence of plus disease,
characterized by increased venous dilation and
arterial tortuosity. These retinal findings determine
whether the disease can be observed safely or
requires prompt inter-vention [2].
Retinal follow-up is continued at intervals based on
retinal findings until the disease has regressed or
screening can be safely discontinued according to
vascular maturation and postmenstrual age [45].
Higher-risk features such as zone I or posterior zone
II disease, pre-plus/plus disease, or stage 3 ROP
generally requiring review within 1 week or less,
whereas lower-risk findings may be fallowed at 2-
week intervals. This is important because
progression may be rapid, with the studies showing
that pre-plus disease can progress to plus disease in
a mean of approximately 2.7 weeks, and faster in
more severe posterior disease [46,47].
Screening is discontinued based on both
postmenstrual age and retinal findings.
Examinations may be stopped when complete
vascularization extends close to the ora serrata for
360°, when zone III vascularization is achieved
without prior zone I or II disease, or when the infant
reaches 45 weeks’ postmenstrual age without
evidence of type 1 ROP. In infants treated with
intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, follow-up must be
prolonged often until at least 65 weeks
postmenstrual age because these medications alter
the natural course of retinal vascular development
and late reactivation has been reported. Particularly
close monitoring is required between 45 and 55
weeks’ postmenstrual age, when recurrence risk is
highest. Clear regression of disease without residual
active vascular tissue is another criterion for safely
ending surveillance [2]. Advanced imaging
modalities are increasingly being explored to
complement standard ophthalmoscopy. Optical
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
87
coherence tomography (OCT), including handheld
and noncontact systems, enables high-resolution
visualization of retinal microstructure and may
detect subtle macular edema or early structural
changes not evident on clinical examination [48].
3.4. Clinical features and long-term outcome
In its early stages, ROP does not produce noticeable
clinical symptoms and can only be detected through
specialized ophthalmologic screening. Nevertheless,
affected infants may exhibit systemic features
related to complications of prematurity rather than
ocular manifestations of the disease itself [49].
Infants with a history of ROP especially severe or
treatment-requiring disease may later demonstrate
visual and neurodevelopmental abnormalities that
become apparent over time. In early infancy,
warning signs of visual impairment may include
poor visual tracking, lack of eye contact, nystagmus,
or failure to reach toward objects. As the child
grows, additional concerns may emerge, such as
strabismus, differences in visual acuity between the
eyes, reduced visual attention, or delayed visual-
motor integration. In more advanced or untreated
cases, retinal detachment may lead to severe visual
impairment or blindness [1]. ROP has been
identified as an independat risk factor for adverse
neurodevelopmental outcomes, with more severe
disease being associated with outcomes such as
cerebral palsy, hearing loss, language development
and intellectual disability [1]. Among very low birth
weight infants, motor delay has been reported in
52.8 % of those with ROP compared with 36.3 % of
those without ROP, while cognitive delay occurs in
46.8 % versus 31.6 % and language delay in 42.5 %
versus 28.4 %, respectively [50].
3.5. Classification
International Classification of Retinopathy of
Prematurity (ICROP) was first introduced in 1984
and has since undergone several revisions. The third
and most recent edition was published in 2024. This
classification system requires each eye to be
described according to zone, plus disease, stage, and
extent to ensure consistent diagnosis and clinical
management (Table 3) [51]. The extent of disease is
described in 30-degree segments corresponding to
clock-hour positions [51].
Table 3. Classification of ROP [5157].
Imaging
Retinal Zones
The retina is divided into three concentric zones centered on the optic disc and extending to
the ora serrata.
Zone I: Innermost circle with a radius equal to twice the distance from the optic disc center
to the foveal center.
Zone II: Surrounds zone I and reaches the nasal ora serrata while extending the same distance
temporally, superiorly and inferiorly. The region within two disc diameters peripheral to the
border of zone I is defined as posterior zone II to denote disease immediately adjacent to
zone I that may be of greater concern.
The term notch was introduced to describe an ROP lesion that extends one to two clock hours
into a more posterior retinal zone than the rest of the disease and the eye is then classified
according to this more posterior zone with the qualifier “secondary to notch.”
Zone III: Represents the remaining peripheral crescent beyond zone II and is diagnosed when
nasal vessels reach the ora serrata and no ROP is present in the two most nasal clock hours.
The temporal border of zone I may be estimated with a 28-diopter lens and in premature
infants the foveal position can be approximated by the center of the macula.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
88
Plus disease
Figure 2.1. Plus disease with notable venous
dilation and arterial tortuosity. Plus disease is out
of proportion to visible peripheral findings,
suggestive of flat neovascularization (stage 3,
white arrows).
Stages
Figure 2.2. Stage 1 demarcation line at border
between vascular and avascular retina (white
arrows).
Figure 2.3. Stage 2 ridge, which is raised (white
arrows) and thicker than stage 1.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
89
Figure 2.4. Stage 3 disease with extraretinal
neovascularization (white arrows).
Aggresive
ROP
Figure 2.5. ROP with severe vasoconstriction,
capillary nonperfusion, non - physiologic dilated
vascular loops and arterio-venous shunts, and plus
disease in zone I.
Retinal
detachement
Figure 2.6. Stage 4B detachment involving the
macula. Straightening of the arcuate vessels and
dragged optic disc appearance.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
90
Total retinal
detachement
Figure 2.7. Wide-angle fundus photograph
showing stage 5A, characterized by a total retinal
detachment with visible optic disc.
ROP - retinopathy of prematurity; ICROP - International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity; RPE -
retinal pigment epithelium; OCT - optical coherence tomography.
3.6. Differential diagnosis
ROP can resemble other neonatal retinal or other eye
disorders, so accurate diagnosis is important because
management and treatment can differ [58].
Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) may
present similarly with peripheral avascular retina,
but is suggested by family history, atypical features,
asymmetry, or progressive disease. Genetic testing
(e.g., LRP5, FZD4) can confirm the diagnosis, and
imaging such as fluorescein angiography may aid
differentiation [5961]. FEVR may also be linked
with stronger myopia, a longer eyeball, and more
noticeable underdevelopment of the fovea, which
can help doctors tell the two conditions apart when
imaging is performed [61].
Persistent fetal vasculature (PFV) is typically
unilateral and associated with microphthalmia or a
retrolental fibrovascular stalk, helping distinguish it
from ROP; imaging and ultrasonography may
support diagnosis [43,58,62]. This is especially
relevant because PFV may mimic retinal detachment
on both clinical examination and ultrasound, despite
requiring different management [62].
Coats disease also involves abnormal retinal vessels
and peripheral nonperfusion. Coats disease is
usually unilateral and characterized by telangiectatic
vessels and marked exudation, particularly in the
absence of prematurity [63,64].
Norrie disease is an X-linked disorder presenting
early with severe bilateral involvment, often
accompanied by hearing loss or developmental
delay, which helps differentiate it from ROP. When
the presentation is unusual, genetic testing can help
confirm the diagnosis [58,65,66].
Systemic conditions such as leukemia, neonatal
sepsis, and meningitis should also be considered in
infants with retinal hemorrhages or other atypical
fundus findingswith diagnosis guided by systemic
features and labaratory results [54,67].
3.7. Management of Retinopathy of Prematurity
Laser photocoagulation remains the gold standard
for the treatment of ROP and is delivered through
laser indirect ophthalmoscopy (LIO) [68].
According to the American Academy of
Ophthalmology, laser photocoa-gulation remains
the preferred treatment for infants with type 1 ROP
requiring peripheral retinal ablation, since it
improves structural and visual outcomes compared
with observation alone or cryotherapy. Treatment
should be performed promptly, ideally within 72
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
91
hours of diagnosis, to decrease the risk of retinal
detachment [69].
In the UK, over 50 % ophthalmologists treating ROP
with laser photocoagulation used general
anaesthesia and 37 % use intravenous sedation [68].
Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor
(anti-VEGF) agents, including bevaci-zumab,
ranibizumab and afliberecpt, have increasingly been
used in selected cases, particularly in aggressive
ROP and very posterior disease, such as zone I or
posterior zone II stage 3+ ROP. Compared with
laser, anti-VEGF treatment is meant to suppress
pathologic neovascularization while still allowing
some normal peripheral retinal vascularization, and
may be associated with less later myopia [59,68].
However, it also carries important limitations - a
greater risk of late reactivation and prolonged
surveillance, also uncertainty regarding the optimal
drug and dose [70,71]. Studies have shown that
bevacizumab at a dose of 0.625 mg can be
beneficial, although later evidence has raised
concerns about late recurrence and sustained
reduction of circulating VEGF levels. Ranibizumab
has also been tested in 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg doses, and
the higher dose may offer better outcomes than laser
in some cases [59]. In the RAINBOW trial,
treatment success at 24 weeks was 80 % with
ranibizumab 0.2 mg, 75 % with ranibizumab 0.1 mg,
and 66 % with laser, and fewer unfavorable
structural outcomes were seen with ranibizumab 0.2
mg than with laser [49]. The FIREFLEYE trial
studied intravitreal aflibercept 0.4 mg versus laser.
Treatment success at 24 weeks was 85.5 % with
aflibercept and 82.1 % with laser, but the study did
not meet its predefined noninferiority margin, so the
results were promising but not enough to show
aflibercept was definitively noninferior to laser [71].
Surgical treatment is generally reserved for
advanced ROP with retinal detachment, such as
stage 4 or 5 disease and usually involves scleral
buckling or vitrectomy [3,72]. Early anatomical
success after surgery is typically higher in stage 4
ROP than in stage 5 disease, exceeding 80 % in stage
4 and approaching 50 % in stage 5. However, retinal
redetachment may still occur after the first
vitrectomy, and most recurrences are reported
within the first several years of life. Outcomes after
repeat surgery are generally poorer than those
achieved after the initial vitrectomy [73]. In stage 4
retinal detachment, lens-sparing vitrectomy appears
to provide better anatomic outcomes than buckle
surgery alone, although combined techniques can
sometimes be considered depending on the
configuration of the detachment and the surgeon’s
preferred approach [72]. Even when retinal
attachment is initially achieved, visual recovery in
stage 5 ROP is often limited and long-term follow-
up is essential because redetachment may occur after
apparently successful surgery [73,74].
Newer classification updates suggest that treatment
choice may depend not only on stage, zone, and plus
disease, but also on whether the ROP is very
posterior, extends slightly into zone I, or shows
vascular changes that fall between pre-plus and plus
disease [75].
3.8. Prevention and Prognosis
Preventing ROP begins with careful control of
oxygen therapy to reduce retinal vessel injury and
interrupted vascular growth, while at the same time
avoiding brain injury and death. In premature
infants, excessive oxygen exposure in the perinatal
period is an important risk factor for ROP [76]. This
meta-analysis found that lower oxygen saturation
targets (8589 %) reduced the risk of severe ROP
compared with higher targets (9195 %), but were
associated with a higher risk of death by 1824
months corrected age. Administration of a single
course of antenatal corticosteroids to women at risk
of preterm delivery between 24 and 35 weeks’
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
92
gestation, as recommended by the American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, has been shown
to reduce the risk of severe ROP [3]. Optimizing
nutrition, including early and adequate parenteral
nutrition, provision of maternal breast milk, and
supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated
fatty acids, as these measures support normal retinal
vascularization and is associated with reduced ROP
risk [3,77].
Poor early postnatal growth and metabolic
disturbance may help identify infants at higher risk
of severe ROP, and emerging metabolomic
biomarkers may further improve prediction of
disease incidence and severity [78]. Strict control of
blood glucose to avoid hyperglycemia, which is an
independent risk factor for severe ROP [45].
Hyperglycemia in ROP has been associated mainly
with relative insulin resistance and impaired
proinsulin metabolism. Some evidence also suggests
that, in very low-birth-weight preterm infants,
elevated glucose itself may not independently
increase the risk of severe ROP, whereas insulin
treatment may be associated with a higher risk. This
raises the possibility that giving insulin to premature
infants with both hyperglycemia and altered insulin
sensitivity may not always be beneficial, although
the available evidence remains limited [76].
ROP prognosis is influenced by disease severity, so
mild cases, especially stages 12, often resolve on
their own without treatment and usually do not cause
major visual loss, although these children still have
a higher risk of strabismus and refractive problems
such as myopia or astigmatism [79]. Outcomes are
generally poorer in the most extremely premature
infants, who tend to develop more severe and more
posterior ROP, require treatment earlier, and have
worse final visual outcomes, with higher rates of
amblyopia and developmental delay [80].
A nationwide Korean study found that visual
impairment during the first 10 years of life was most
frequent in very low-birth-weight children, reaching
4.5 per 100 person-years compared with 2.2 overall.
Visual impairment was least frequent in infants
treated with laser or cryotherapy (1.6 %), slightly
higher after anti-VEGF therapy (2.9 %), and much
more common in those who underwent vitrectomy
or scleral buckling (32.2 %). This difference most
likely reflects the greater severity of disease in eyes
requiring surgery rather than the surgical procedure
itself [81]. Comparative studies suggest that anti-
VEGF therapy may provide advantages over laser
photocoagulation in posterior ROP, including
improved structural outcomes and reduced myopia,
particularly in zone I (4 % vs 22 %). However, no
sognificant diference was found for zone II disease
[3]. In another study, where 12 randomized control
trials were made, anti-VEGF therapy was linked to
lower risks of retinal detachment, fewer surgical
interventions, and a lower risk of myopia, but on the
other hand, anti-VEGF therapy was associated with
a higher mortality risk than laser therapy [82].
A major aim of ROP treatment is to prevent
unfavorable structural retinal outcomes, such as
macula-involving retinal fold or detachment,
retrolental tissue, or the need for vitreoretinal
surgery. In ETROP follow-up, early treatment
reduced unfavorable structural outcomes to 9.1 % at
2 years [83]. In another study of five-year visual
outcome in Japan, about one-quarter of treated eyes
had 20/20 or better best-corrected visual acuity at 5
years, so even after treatment, completely normal
vision was not the most common outcome [84].
4. Conclusion
Retinopathy of prematurity remains a major
complication of prematurity, arising from disrupted
VEGF-driven retinal vascular development with a
biphasic pathogenesis of early vessel regression
followed by hypoxia-driven neovascularization.
Major risk factors are low gestational age and birth
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
93
weight, unstable oxygenation, infection, blood
transfusions and inadequate nutrition. These factors
determine which infants require screening and closer
monitoring. Diagnosis and classification rely on
timely, risk-based ophthalmoscopic screening
supplemented by wide-field imaging, fluores-cein
angiography and OCT, and are reported using the
ICROP framework of zones, stages and plus disease.
Treatment options include peripheral laser
photocoagulation, intravitreal anti-VEGF and
vitreoretinal surgery for retinal detachments. Each
can improve structural outcomes but often
necessitates prolonged follow-up, and further
research into phase-specific biologic therapies and
safer systemic strategies is needed to optimize long-
term visual and neurological development.
References
1. Davis BE, Leppert MO, German K, Lehmann CU,
Adams-Chapman I, Council On Children With
Disabilities, et al. Primary Care Framework to
Monitor Preterm Infants for Neurodevelopmental
Outcomes in Early Childhood. Pediatrics.
2023;152(1):e2023062511 doi:10.1542/peds.2023-
062511.
2. Fierson WM, American Academy Of Pediatrics
Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy Of
Ophthalmology, American Association For
Pediatric Ophthalmology And Strabismus,
American Association Of Certified Orthoptists,
Chiang MF, et al. Screening Examination of
Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20183061
doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3061.
3. Sabri K, Ells AL, Lee EY, Dutta S, Vinekar A.
Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Global Perspective
and Recent Developments. Pediatrics.
2022;150(3):e2021053924 doi:10.1542/peds.2021-
053924.
4. Bashinsky AL. Retinopathy of Prematurity. N C
Med J. 2017;78(2):124128
doi:10.18043/ncm.78.2.124.
5. Gilbert CE. Global perspectives of retinopathy of
prematurity. Indian J Ophthalmol.
2023;71(11):34313433
doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2714_23.
6. Kizilay O, Karaca S, Oto BB, Celik G. Incidence
of Retinopathy of Prematurity Between 2021 and
2024: Results from a Single Center. Beyoglu Eye J.
2025;10(3):142148 doi:10.14744/bej.2025.21549.
7. Hartnett ME2. Pathophysiology of Retinopathy of
Prematurity. Annual Review of Vision Science,.
;9(Volume 9, 2023):3970 doi:10.1146/annurev-
vision-093022-021420.
8. Bhatnagar A, Skrehot HC, Bhatt A, Herce H,
Weng CY. Epidemiology of Retinopathy of
Prematurity in the US From 2003 to 2019. JAMA
Ophthalmol. 2023;141(5):479485
doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.0809.
9. Hasegawa T, McLeod DS, Prow T, Merges C,
Grebe R, Lutty GA. Vascular precursors in
developing human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2008;49(5):21782192 doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0632.
10. Simmons AB, Bretz CA, Wang H, Kunz E, Hajj
K, Kennedy C, et al. Gene therapy knockdown of
VEGFR2 in retinal endothelial cells to treat
retinopathy. Angiogenesis. 2018;21(4):751764
doi:10.1007/s10456-018-9618-5.
11. Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Sapieha P, Sirinyan
M, Beauchamp M, Checchin D, Hardy P, et al.
Understanding ischemic retinopathies: emerging
concepts from oxygen-induced retinopathy. Doc
Ophthalmol. 2010;120(1):5160
doi:10.1007/s10633-009-9201-x.
12. Shosha E, Fouda AY, Narayanan SP, Caldwell
RW, Caldwell RB. Is the Arginase Pathway a Novel
Therapeutic Avenue for Diabetic Retinopathy? J
Clin Med. 2020;9(2):425. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020425
doi:10.3390/jcm9020425.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
94
13. Narayanan SP, Rojas M, Suwanpradid J, Toque
HA, Caldwell RW, Caldwell RB. Arginase in
retinopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;36:260280
doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.06.002.
14. Sears JE, Hoppe G, Ebrahem Q, Anand-Apte B.
Prolyl hydroxylase inhibition during hyperoxia
prevents oxygen-induced retinopathy. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(50):1989819903
doi:10.1073/pnas.0805817105.
15. Di Fiore JM, Bloom JN, Orge F, Schutt A,
Schluchter M, Cheruvu VK, et al. A higher
incidence of intermittent hypoxemic episodes is
associated with severe retinopathy of prematurity. J
Pediatr. 2010;157(1):6973
doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.01.046.
16. Poets CF, Roberts RS, Schmidt B, Whyte RK,
Asztalos EV, Bader D, et al. Association Between
Intermittent Hypoxemia or Bradycardia and Late
Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants.
JAMA. 2015;314(6):595603
doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8841.
17. Askie LM, Darlow BA, Davis PG, Finer N,
Stenson B, Vento M, et al. Effects of targeting lower
versus higher arterial oxygen saturations on death or
disability in preterm infants. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):CD011190
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011190.pub2.
18. Shukla A, Sonnie C, Worley S, Sharma A,
Howard D, Moore J, et al. Comparison of Biphasic
vs Static Oxygen Saturation Targets Among Infants
With Retinopathy of Prematurity. JAMA
Ophthalmol. 2019;137(4):417423
doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.7021.
19. Travers CP, Clark RH, Spitzer AR, Das A,
Garite TJ, Carlo WA. Exposure to any antenatal
corticosteroids and outcomes in preterm infants by
gestational age: prospective cohort study. BMJ.
2017;356:j1039 doi:10.1136/bmj.j1039.
20. Fang JL, Sorita A, Carey WA, Colby CE, Murad
MH, Alahdab F. Interventions To Prevent
Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Meta-analysis.
Pediatrics. 2016;137(4):e20153387. doi:
10.1542/peds.20153387. Epub 2016 Mar 9
doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3387.
21. Almeida Ana C., Brízido Margarida, Susana T,
Coelho Constança, Borrego Luís Miguel, Miguel C.
Incidence and Risk Factors for Retinopathy of
Prematurity in a Portuguese Cohort. Journal of
Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus.
2022;59(4):254260 doi:10.3928/01913913-
20220104-01.
22. Woo SJ, Park KH, Jung HJ, Kim Sn, Choe G,
Ahn J, et al. Effects of maternal and placental
inflammation on retinopathy of prematurity. Graefes
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(6):915923
doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1648-2.
23. Ahn YJ, Hong KE, Yum HR, Lee JH, Kim KS,
Youn YA, et al. Characteristic clinical features
associated with aggressive posterior retinopathy of
prematurity. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(6):924930
doi:10.1038/eye.2017.18.
24. Chen ML, Allred EN, Hecht JL, Onderdonk A,
VanderVeen D, Wallace DK, et al. Placenta
microbiology and histology and the risk for severe
retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
Sci. 2011;52(10):70527058 doi:10.1167/iovs.11-
7380.
25. Prasad M, Ingolfsland EC, Christiansen SP.
Modifiable Risk Factors and Preventative Strategies
for Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity. Life (Basel).
2023;13(5):1075. doi: 10.3390/life13051075
doi:10.3390/life13051075.
26. Wang X, Tang K, Chen L, Cheng S, Xu H.
Association between sepsis and retinopathy of
prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e025440
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025440.
27. Hua S, Huang J, Wu Z, Feng Z. A comparison
study between Candida parapsilosis sepsis and
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
95
Candida albicans sepsis in preterm infants. Turk J
Pediatr. 2012;54(5):502508.
28. Fundora JB, Binenbaum G, Tomlinson L, Yu Y,
Ying G, Maheshwari A, et al. Association of
Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Its Timing
with Retinopathy of Prematurity. Am J Perinatol.
2023;40(11):11781184 doi:10.1055/s-0041-
1733785.
29. Uberos J, Fernandez-Marin E, Campos-Martínez
A, Ruiz-López A, García-Serrano JL. Blood
products transfusion and retinopathy of prematurity:
A cohort study. Acta Ophthalmol.
2023;101(3):e294e301 doi:10.1111/aos.15269.
30. Teofili L, Papacci P, Orlando N, Bianchi M,
Molisso A, Purcaro V, et al. Allogeneic cord blood
transfusions prevent fetal haemoglobin depletion in
preterm neonates. Results of the CB-TrIP study. Br
J Haematol. 2020;191(2):263268
doi:10.1111/bjh.16851.
31. Rivera JC, Holm M, Austeng D, Morken TS,
Zhou T(, Beaudry-Richard A, et al. Retinopathy of
prematurity: inflammation, choroidal degeneration,
and novel promising therapeutic strategies. Journal
of Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):165
doi:10.1186/s12974-017-0943-1.
32. Ohlsson A, Aher SM. Early erythropoiesis‐
stimulating agents in preterm or low birth weight
infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
2017(11) doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004863.pub5.
33. Ohlsson A, Aher SM. Early erythropoietin for
preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm
and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews. 2014(4)
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004863.pub4.
34. Fares A, Abdelmonaim S, Sayed D, Sadek S,
Abdulrazek A, Helmy Y, et al. Validation of
WINROP algorithm as screening tool of retinopathy
of prematurity among Egyptian preterm neonates.
Eye (Lond). 2024;38(8):15621566
doi:10.1038/s41433-024-02953-1.
35. Souverein EA, Siegel BA, Siegel LM, Reid MW,
Lee TC, Nallasamy S. Initiation of retinopathy of
prematurity screening examinations in extremely
premature infants. J AAPOS. 2024;28(4):103956
doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.103956.
36. Altamirano F, Yuan M, Hoyek S, Hu D, Abidi
M, Chaaya C, et al. Evaluating the Utility of Initial
Examinations in Retinopathy of Prematurity:
Proposal of FIRST-ROP Algorithm for a Medium-
Risk Cohort. Ophthalmology. 2025;132(6):713717
doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.01.004.
37. Fierson WM, Capone AJ, American Academy of
Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology, American
Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association
of Certified Orthoptists. Telemedicine for evaluation
of retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics.
2015;135(1):238 doi:10.1542/peds.2014-0978.
38. Kremer LJ, Medlicott N, Sime MJ, Broadbent R,
Edmonds L, Berry MJ, et al. Low dose or very low
dose phenylephrine and cyclopentolate microdrops
for retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations
(The Little Eye Drop Study): a randomised
controlled non-inferiority trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed. 2023;108(4):380386
doi:10.1136/archdischild-2022-324929.
39. Szigiato A, Speckert M, Zielonka J, Hollamby
K, Altomare F, Ng E, et al. Effect of Eye Masks on
Neonatal Stress Following Dilated Retinal
Examination: The MASK-ROP Randomized
Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol.
2019;137(11):12651272
doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3379.
40. Disher T, Cameron C, Mitra S, Cathcart K,
Campbell-Yeo M. Pain-Relieving Interventions for
Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Meta-analysis.
Pediatrics. 2018;142(1):e20180401. doi:
10.1542/peds.20180401. Epub 2018 Jun 1
doi:10.1542/peds.2018-0401.
41. Dempsey E, McCreery K. Local anaesthetic eye
drops for prevention of pain in preterm infants
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
96
undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011(9)
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007645.pub2.
42. Kleberg A, Warren I, Norman E, Mrelius E,
Berg A, Mat-Ali E, et al. Lower Stress Responses
After Newborn Individualized Developmental Care
and Assessment Program Care During Eye
Screening Examinations for Retinopathy of
Prematurity: A Randomized Study. Pediatrics.
2008;121(5):e1267e1278 doi:10.1542/peds.2006-
2510.
43. Brady CJ, D'Amico S, Campbell JP.
Telemedicine for Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(4):556564
doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0010.
44. Coyner A, Murickan T, Oh M, Young B, Ostmo
S, Singh P, et al. Multinational External Validation
of Autonomous Retinopathy of Prematurity
Screening. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2024;142:327
335 doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.0045.
45. Hellström A, Smith LEH, Dammann O.
Retinopathy of prematurity. Lancet.
2013;382(9902):14451457 doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(13)60178-6.
46. Berrocal AM, Fan KC, Al-Khersan H, Negron
CI, Murray T. Retinopathy of Prematurity:
Advances in the Screening and Treatment of
Retinopathy of Prematurity Using a Single Center
Approach. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;233:189215
doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.07.016.
47. Cheng QE, Quinn GE, Daniel E, Baumritter A,
Smith E, Ying G, et al. Progression from preplus to
plus disease in the Telemedicine Approaches to
Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity
(e-ROP) Study: incidence, timing, and predictors. J
AAPOS. 2020;24(6):354.e1354.e6
doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.07.016.
48. Mangalesh S, Seely KR, Tran-Viet D, Tai V,
Chen X, Prakalapakorn SG, et al. Integrated
Visualization Highlighting Retinal Changes in
Retinopathy of Prematurity From 3-Dimensional
Optical Coherence Tomography Data. JAMA
Ophthalmol. 2022;140(7):725729
doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.1344.
49.Kaur K, Mikes BA. Retinopathy of Prematurity.
StatPearls Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls
Publishing LLC; 2026.
50. Ahn J, Lee KM, Kim MJ, Park H, Kim YJ, Ahn
SJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in very low
birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity
in a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep.
2022;12(1):50538 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-
09053-8.
51. Chiang MF, Quinn GE, Fielder AR, Ostmo SR,
Paul Chan RV, Berrocal A, et al. International
Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third
Edition. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(10):e51e68
doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.031.
52. Kim SJ, Campbell JP, Kalpathy-Cramer J,
Ostmo S, Jonas KE, Choi D, et al. Accuracy and
Reliability of Eye-Based vs Quadrant-Based
Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of
Prematurity. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(6):648
655 doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1195.
53. Fleck BW, Williams C, Juszczak E, Cocker K,
Stenson BJ, Darlow BA, et al. An international
comparison of retinopathy of prematurity grading
performance within the Benefits of Oxygen
Saturation Targeting II trials. Eye. 2018;32(1):74
80 doi:10.1038/eye.2017.150.
54. International Committee for the Classification of
Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International
Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity
revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):991999
doi:10.1001/archopht.123.7.991.
55. Flynn JT, Chan-Ling T. Retinopathy of
Prematurity: Two Distinct Mechanisms That
Underlie Zone 1 and Zone 2 Disease. Am J
Ophthalmol. 2006;142(1):4659.e2
doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.018.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
97
56. Gadkari SS, Deshpande M, Kulkarni S.
Minimally fibrotic stage 5 ROP: a clinical
prognostic factor in eyes undergoing vitrectomy for
stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Graefe's Archive
for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
2016;254(7):13031309 doi:10.1007/s00417-015-
3197-6.
57. Ozsaygili C, Ozdek S, Ozmen MC, Atalay HT,
Yeter DY. PREOPERATIVE ANATOMICAL
FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED
SURGICAL OUTCOMES FOR STAGE 5
RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY. Retina.
2021;41(4).
58. Hong EH, Shin YU, Cho H. Retinopathy of
prematurity: a review of epidemiology and current
treatment strategies. Clin Exp Pediatr.
2022;65(3):115126 doi:10.3345/cep.2021.00773.
59. Broxterman EC, Hug DA. Retinopathy of
Prematurity: A Review of Current Screening
Guidelines and Treatment Options. Mo Med.
2016;113(3):187190.
60. Ozdemir Zeydanli E, Ozdek S. Comment on:
Underlying Disease in Atypical Retinopathy of
Prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025;280:511512
doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2025.07.042.
61. Paul Chan RV, Williams SL, Yonekawa Y,
Weissgold DJ, Lee TC, Chiang MF. Accuracy of
retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis by retinal
fellows. Retina. 2010;30(6):958965
doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c9696a.
62. Scruggs BA, Chan RVP, Kalpathy-Cramer J,
Chiang MF, Campbell JP. Artificial Intelligence in
Retinopathy of Prematurity Diagnosis. Transl Vis
Sci Technol. 2020;9(2):5 doi:10.1167/tvst.9.2.5.
63. Sen M, Shields CL, Honavar SG, Shields JA.
Coats disease: An overview of classification,
management and outcomes. Indian J Ophthalmol.
2019;67(6):763771 doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_841_19.
64. Early Treatment For Retinopathy Of Prematurity
Cooperative Group. Revised indications for the
treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of
the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity
randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol.
2003;121(12):16841694
doi:10.1001/archopht.121.12.1684.
65. VanderVeen DK, Cataltepe SU. Anti-vascular
endothelial growth factor intravitreal therapy for
retinopathy of prematurity. Semin Perinatol.
2019;43(6):375380
doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2019.05.011.
66. Wong ES, Choy RW, Zhang Y, Chan HY, Chen
LJ, Pang CP, et al. Global and Regional Trends in
Retinopathy of Prematurity. JAMA Ophthalmol.
2026;144(2):139147
doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.5103.
67. Narang SK, Haney S, Duhaime A, Martin J,
Binenbaum G, de Alba Campomanes AG, et al.
Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children:
Technical Report. Pediatrics.
2025;155(3):e2024070457 doi:10.1542/peds.2024-
070457.
68. Baiad AA, Sun C, Yin GS, Popovic MM, Muni
RH, Mireskandari K, et al. A Meta-Analysis of
Intravitreal Ranibizumab versus Laser
Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Retinopathy
of Prematurity. Ophthalmology Retina.
2025;9(7):677689 doi:10.1016/j.oret.2025.01.012.
69. Taher NO, Ghaddaf AA, Al-Ghamdi SA, Homsi
JJ, Al-Harbi BJ, Alomari LK, et al. Intravitreal Anti-
vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection for
Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne).
2022;9:884608 doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.884608.
70. Chaaya C, Hoyek S, Patel NA. Update on
Management of Retinopathy of Prematurity: A
Review. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2025;65(1):8190
doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000552.
71. Stahl A, Sukgen EA, Wu W, Lepore D,
Nakanishi H, Mazela J, et al. Effect of Intravitreal
Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation on Treatment
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
98
Success of Retinopathy of Prematurity: The
FIREFLEYE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA.
2022;328(4):348359
doi:10.1001/jama.2022.10564.
72. Saeed OB, Siatkowski RM, Coussa RG. Primary
scleral buckling vs. vitrectomy for stage 4A
retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and
meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Eye (Lond).
2025;39(3):418423 doi:10.1038/s41433-024-
03563-7.
73. Chang Y, Kang EY, Chen K, Wang N, Liu L,
Hwang Y, et al. Long-term surgical outcomes and
prognostic factors for advanced-stage retinopathy of
prematurity after vitrectomy. Br J Ophthalmol.
2024;109(1):126132 doi:10.1136/bjo-2023-
323723.
74. Sen P, Bhende P, Rishi E, Gopal L, Jain S.
Anatomical and Visual Outcomes in Stage 5
Retinopathy of Prematurity with Microincision
Vitrectomy Surgery. Retina. 2021;41(2):331337
doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002837.
75. Fielder AR, Quinn GE, Paul Chan RV,
Holmström GE, Chiang MF, ICROP 3 Classification
Committee. Retinopathy of prematurity
classification updates: possible implications for
treatment. J AAPOS. 2022;26(3):109112
doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.03.003.
76. Liegl R, Hellström A, Smith LE. Retinopathy of
prematurity: the need for prevention. Eye Brain.
2016;8:91102 doi:10.2147/EB.S99038.
77. Cayabyab R, Ramanathan R. Retinopathy of
Prematurity: Therapeutic Strategies Based on
Pathophysiology. Neonatology. 2016;109(4):369
376 doi:10.1159/000444901.
78. Tomita Y, Usui-Ouchi A, Nilsson AK, Yang J,
Ko M, Hellström A, et al. Metabolism in
Retinopathy of Prematurity. Life (Basel).
2021;11(11):1119. doi: 10.3390/life11111119
doi:10.3390/life11111119.
79. Brumbaugh JE, Bell EF, Hirsch SC, Crenshaw
EG, DeMauro SB, Adams-Chapman IS, et al.
Relationships between retinopathy of prematurity
without ophthalmologic intervention and
neurodevelopment and vision at 2 years. Pediatr
Res. 2023;94(5):17201730 doi:10.1038/s41390-
021-01778-y.
80. Yuan M, Chaaya C, Altamirano F, Hu D, Hoyek
S, Abidi M, et al. Retinopathy of Prematurity in the
Extremely Premature: Disease Burden, Treatment
Approaches, and Visual Outcomes in Micro- and
Nano-Premature Infants. Am J Ophthalmol.
2025;280:4050 doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2025.08.004.
81. Na K, Kim KH, Kang TU, Hann HJ, Ahn HS,
Kim HJ. Incidence, Long-Term Visual Outcomes,
and Mortality in Retinopathy of Prematurity in
Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(10):14
doi:10.1167/iovs.61.10.14.
82. Wang W, Yao Y, Lan C, Hung S, Tsung T, Chen
Y, et al. Impact of anti-VEGF therapy versus laser
therapy on mortality and treatment outcomes in
retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2026;104(1):e1
e17 doi:10.1111/aos.17541.
83.Young A, Bigcas JM. Tracheal Resection.
StatPearls Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls
Publishing LLC; 2026.
84. Tomioka M, Murakami T, Okamoto F, Kinoshita
T, Shinomiya K, Nishi T, et al. FIVE-YEAR
VISUAL OUTCOME OF TREATMENT FOR
RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY IN
INFANTS WEIGHING Retina. 2024;44(4):652
658 doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004016.
Journal of Medical Sciences. 18 Jun, 2026 - Volume 14 | Issue 4. Electronic - ISSN: 2345-0592
99